My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-04-21 Tgp-amendment
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-04-21 Tgp-amendment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 1:56:07 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 1:56:03 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
subdivided to 2-acre lots. There is a pending subdivision; theres a subdivision thats been in the <br />Planning Department pending for some time, which they finish up their archaeological studies on <br />the property. The idea is, the General Plan map should reflect the actual usage of the property <br />for it to be in, subdivided in, for it to be subdivided into 2-acre lots they would be more <br />consistent to say that thats a Rural classification in the General Plan than Important Ag. It does <br />not change the zoning and there is a statement in the description of Rural that being put into the <br />rural classification does not imply support for further rezoning or subdivision of the property. <br />And its really when to recognize what already exists. <br />ALAMEDA:Thank you. Questions? Any other comments before we move to <br />testimony? <br />YUEN:No thats fine. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay.Whydontwemoveintothenextstageofthisprocess.Idliketo <br />invite Thomas Greenwell, Ambika Kosada, Margaret Wille, Brenda Ford, if you can come <br />forward? Make yourself comfortable. Let me just provide some structure on this next phase. <br />We do want to hear your thoughts. Some of you are coming before us again and thats okay. <br />We ask that you highlight the issues or the points that you want to make. For many of you we <br />have your written testimony already so I would encourage you not to re-read what you have <br />already sent in but again just kind of highlight for us. And if you can think about a 3 to 5 minute, <br />keeping your testimony within that range wed really appreciate it. You can give it to staff. And <br />then when youre finished with your testimony we will, we may have questions. Also please <br />note that once youre done with your testimony you cannot testify again. Okay so, with that <br />being said why dont we start with-, well could you all raise your right hand? Do you swear or <br />affirm to tell the truth now before the Hawaii County Planning Commission? <br />TESTIFIERS:I do. <br />ALAMEDA:Thank you. Well start off on my left. If you could please state your <br />name and address for the record. Yes. Microphone. Name and address for the record and then <br />you may proceed with your testimony. <br />KOSADA:My name is Ambika Kosada. I live at 82-6103 Napoopoo Road. I thank you <br />for having me here. I have not testified before and I understood it the other way around I gave you <br />an outline of my testimony and I have more to say than whats on the page so Ill try to make it very <br />quick. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay go ahead. <br />KOSADA:I am testifying specifically about the area that Mr. Yuen just described. <br />Im not sure of the language but Id like you to delete F-2 from the amendments at this time and I <br />have 6 reasons. Number 1 a t <br />EXHIBIT D <br />6 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.