My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-04-21 TShockley
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-04-21 TShockley
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 1:56:19 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 1:56:17 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
this green dot on this particular map. The applicant does not, the owners do not intend to sell the <br />property or any of the lots. They intend to construct another single family dwelling on the front <br />lot or the lot that is at the corner of Kaloko Drive and Huehue Street. The existing roadway in <br />that area Kaloko Mauka Drive as well as Huehue Street has a right of way width of 80[-]feet <br />with a 22-foot pavement with grass shoulders. Just as a matter of information we showed this <br />information to the County Council and at their request they wanted to know the number of <br />dwellings that currently use the Kaloko Drive, Highway 190 intersection. Based on our count <br />from information received from the Real Property Tax Office records approximately 290 <br />dwellings currently use this particular intersection and that would be the Kaloko Drive and <br />Highway 190 intersection. Of that approximately 270 dwellings are situated or have been <br />constructed within the Kaloko Mauka Subdivision. Based on previous rezoning application we <br />have since collected, and based on the conditions imposed on previous rezoning we have <br />collected and have cash on hand approximately, slightly over $400,000 for the intersection <br />improvement. We also received as part of a previous rezoning application theres a condition <br />that required the applicant to do a, basically a cost estimate for the intersection improvement. <br />That was completed back in December 15, 2005 and submitted to our office as well as the <br />Department of Public Works as to proposing the improvements at this particular intersection. <br />This report is currently, has been transmitted to the State Department of Transportation for their <br />inputandcomment.So,weareawaitingwordfromtheDepartmentofTransportationasto <br />whether they agree with these improvements proposed by one of the applicants in its study. <br />With that the Planning Directors recommending approval of this particular request and the <br />conditions that are proposed are similar to those that were previously granted for those properties <br />that were requesting rezoning to an Agricultural 10-acre zoning. Are there any questions? <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Watanabe? <br />WATANABE:For clarification Norman. Its my understanding that then the design is <br />complete for that but its subject to approval by the State? It has been submitted to the State <br />Department of Transportation? <br />HAYASHI:This is a design study that was submitted by one of the applicants that we <br />received the rezoning application for that area and that was a requirement of the zone change. <br />Now basically they had spelled out what their engineer had indicated as to the type of <br />improvements that would be required for this intersection. And that is what is being reviewed <br />now by the State Department of Transportation to determine whether these improvements are <br />feasible or not. <br />WATANABE:Okay. Thank you but that also included an estimate at that time yeah? <br />HAYASHI:Yes. The estimate that they had provided in their study was <br />approximately $300,000 +. So technically based on the amount of monies that weve already <br />collected and have in our account if those improvements are in fact what would be required then <br />perhaps we would have enough money to cover those improvements. However there were some <br />questions brought up at the County Council level that perhaps there should be some signalization <br />also at that particular intersection. So based on that you can see that additional will be required. <br />EXHIBIT C <br />2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.