2006-04-21 TSeascape-development

Home

of Kakahiaka Street from the Lokahi Subdivision through the property to the southside of the property. If we can refer to their submitted site plan. Thiswould be the Lokahi Makai and the Lokahi Mauka Subdivision. Kona Palisades would be identified in this area and we have Kaiminani Drive travelling from the east-west direction. From Kakahiaka Street they would travel through the Lokahi Subdivisions and then through their property to the southsideof their property. The applicantsare required to improve the extension to be a 50-foot wide street with curbs, gutters and sidewalks along one side. Theyre requesting in this amendment request to be able to construct to the driveway access of their project and to defer the remainder of the construction until such time that theres either development on the south property, which is owned by the State or if there happens to be a connection that comes across, a road connection, which would be at the discretion of the Director. If I could refer to the rewording of the submitted condition. Were actually looking at the condition, the new Condition G. What weve done in the amended ordinances, weve deleted Condition E because Condition E required that final subdivision approval be secured within 5 years and the applicant has already received final subdivisionapprovalandthisisthelayoutofthatprevioussubdivision.Thishasbecomea separate TMK at this point and the road itself is a separate roadway lot. So we are withdrawing or dropping that condition and re-alphabetizing conditions after that. So the new condition that were looking at to amend is Condition G. And if I could read that itll state that, The applicant shall construct the extension of Kakahiaka Street through the subject property, and this is the new added portion, to the driveway entrance of any development of the area covered by this rezoning ordinance as a 50-foot wide street to dedicable standards with concrete curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements along one side of the road. The applicant shall construct the required improvements prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and dedicate them to the County upon request. Also added is, The remainder of Road Lot 5 to the southern boundary of the property shall be set aside as a future road reserve, along with any necessary construction easements and improved to dedicable standards by the applicant, successors or assigns, when the Planning Director determines that this road will serve a useful function. When required by the Director the road shall be constructed in the manner specified by the Department of Public Works and shall be on an alignment meeting with the approval of the Planning Director in consultation with the Department of Public Works. Also added is, The obligation to build the road shall be secured by a covenant running with the land recorded against at least one of the parcels created by Subdivision No. 02-000051, or the applicant may build the road or bond its construction. The Planning Department has received 2 letters, one from Barbara Scott and one from Richard Fucik, those hopefully have been passed out to the Commissioners. The Planning Director has recommended that this request be forwarded to the Hawaii County Council with a favorable recommendation by the Planning Commission. Are there any questions? ALAMEDA:Fellow Commissioners any questions for Staff? Commissioner Watanabe? WATANABE:Darrow, could you explain to us exactly how much longer I mean that the length of road, Im not certain how long that length is. DARROW:If we refer to this area, this is the proposed layout of the project that Seascape Development is planning on developing. The property is identified in this area. Ive outlined the roadway lot that runs along the eastside of the parcel and it will be improved EXHIBIT A 2