Laserfiche WebLink
it will be done you know should there ever become a need to having it completed. I€d like to <br />also note that there are, as the Staff had pointed out, there are 3 other parcels that were part of <br />this subdivision and which at some point in time are going to go in for entitlement. And so if at <br />some point in time this Commission or the Director or the Council decide when they consider <br />that particular lot for development then this issue of the roadway will again be revisited. But <br />notwithstanding that if nothing happens to the 3 remaining parcels there is this obligation on the <br />part of the developer to complete the road when the County deems it appropriate. <br />ALAMEDA:Fellow Commissioners you€ve heard Mr. Fuke€s comments and <br />explanations regarding the application. Any questions for him? Commissioner Graham? <br />GRAHAM:Good morning Sidney. The obvious question that springs forth was <br />wasn€t too long ago that this came before the Commission and to the Council so is anything <br />changed or you know why did it-, why is it presented the way it was before and now you want it <br />differentthat€sall? <br />FUKE:Sure.Ithinkthatyouknowlikewhentherequestfirstcameitwas <br />partially the recommendation for having the roadway completed you know I think was a <br />recommendation based on the Planning Department€s position because they€re doing the studies <br />to figure out like connectivity and there€s always this interest of connectivity. The applicant <br />obviously you know can accept that. However like, you know generally what happens is that <br />after you go through the development phases then you look at each condition and then you begin <br />to realize like oh maybe this condition was not really like how we had intended it to be. And <br />that€s the reason why you know I think as they were going through the development phase and <br />they realized like where the driveway was going to be and the kind of potential problems it was <br />going to be creating you know for the residents of that area, the future residents of that area, then <br />they thought it might be better to not construct it. You know you had asked earlier <br />Commissioner Graham about the roadway condition in that area, it€s pretty uniform and as a <br />matter of fact in conferring with Mr. Dickler this morning they have construction plans prepared <br />for the entire stretch. So it€s not so much a question of they want to wiggle out of this condition <br />it€s more like is it appropriate now given the situation that you have these people that are going <br />to be living in that area you€re going to have potential for this stretch 3 to 400 feet that can, it€s <br />not going to be utilized and create potential safety and maintenance and liability concerns for not <br />only the developer but also for the County. <br />ALAMEDA:Follow up Commissioner Graham? <br />GRAHAM:Thank you. <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Iwashita? <br />IWASHITA:In the papers that we have the Police Department response to the request is <br />basically to oppose it. And the recommendation from the Police Department is that the road be <br />built and that an additional requirement be imposed to establish barricades of some sort to <br />prevent vehicles from going beyond the Seascape project until the time, such time that the <br />EXHIBIT A <br />5 <br /> <br />