Laserfiche WebLink
WITTEN: Certainly. I think – again, thank you to Maija for clari <br />because that is one that a lot of testimony was focused on – and <br />25, is clearly obligated and is committed to implement the roadw <br />development. But as was stated in many of the testimony, it beco <br />of actual rooftops or commercial development to build that infra <br />current section of the connector road, which was, you know, forc <br />the Ranch to implement that in advance of specific triggers with <br />the Ranch and the Town Center development, assuming the economic <br />anxious to implement development that will start to recover some <br />infrastructure. And then as the commercial development, if there <br />development, the Town Center area would be the focal point and w <br />improvements and the completion of Lindsey Road, which I know is <br />community. So it’s not a matter of trying to dodge requirements; <br />implementing the master plan as approved in the prior zoning ord <br />provided for under that ordinance. So it’s a matter of, hopefull <br />and ideally within five years everybody will be happy to see som <br />Waimea Town Center that would support the remaining infrastructu <br />connections. <br />GIFFIN: Commissioners, any questions of the applicant’s represen <br />anyone else from the public that I may have missed who would lik <br />PRICE: Excuse me. Could I make a statement, another one? <br />GIFFIN: Sure. Please feel free to come up. Bring your chair up, <br />Nahua stand up. Just bring your chair up. That’s fine. Go ahead <br />PRICE: Michael Price. <br />GIFFIN: Thank you. Go ahead. <br />PRICE: I’ve heard, you know, what a burden this is for Parker Ra <br />requirement, there has been in the past an effort to find a way <br />connector road. One of them was the capital facilities district <br />people buying the houses. There was discussion about feasibility <br />Parker Ranch and utilizing part of the $10,000,000 set aside as <br />improve traffic circulation in Waimea. So I don’t want you to co <br />Committee is insisting that Parker Ranch build that road right n <br />circumstance. They actively participate in our committee. But th <br />mentioned in the 2009 letter from the committee; those options b <br />and Parker Ranch could pay them back. The important thing is we’ <br />already that should have been addressed in the traffic impact an <br />five, ten and 20 years. I want the Planning Commission to consid <br />try and do the same thing they did with the Parker School situat <br />but this Commission decided that they were also impacting the tr <br />stipulated terms with a set timetable for them to perform them. <br />Some of you were not participants in that. That’s all I have to <br /> <br />