Laserfiche WebLink
commitment that the road would be constructed and dedicated to C <br />the County. So we have proposed revisions to that condition, whi <br />with. But we basically want to go on record to state that we are <br />to have a clear reference to the commitments as far as Easement <br />conformance with the Waimea Development Agreement between Parker <br />Hawai‘i, dated 2000, and that there is no, and that the referenc <br />be deleted from that. I do have a proposed language that we’ve p <br />Department, if the Commission desires to make an amendment to th <br />you know, we’d appreciate your favorable recommendation and movi <br />cleaned up, get the zoning cleaned up, as Maija has pointed out. <br />proceed with the remaining steps to complete the land exchange w <br />forward with their planning for their campus expansion. <br />GIFFIN: Thank you. What I was going to do this morning was, when <br />people that did sign up to testify go ahead and give public test <br />people who have turned in written testimony and are here this mo <br />to also testify. But since you raised this question regarding th <br />would be really a good idea to hear from Maija or Jeff or Daryn <br />proposal, the Planning Director’s proposal for Condition C to no <br />just spoke up. And could we do that now, please, since we are on <br />have something that we can put up or Maija can speak up, so that <br />the wording as well? <br />COTTLE: I could read the wording. That’s the only copy that we r <br />here, so I can read the wording. <br />GIFFIN: Okay, good. All right. Commissioners, I’m going to pass <br />follow along with Maija – the conditions that the Ranch proposed <br />came up with for Condition No. C. Okay. <br />COTTLE: So let me read the condition, and then I’ll explain the <br />applicant’s proposed revision reads, “The applicant, its success <br />within easement U-1 in conformance with the Waimea Development A <br />Ranch and the State of Hawai‘i, Department of Education, dated J <br />be constructed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy f <br />building permit(s) for residential structures on the RS-7.5 zone <br />or the easement that’s been referred to, is right in this area h <br />agreement between DOE and Parker Ranch states that if the school <br />are only obligated to construct it from the entrance, from the L <br />entrance of the expanded school campus; so the DOE is not obliga <br />agreement to create a divider road here and extend it all the wa <br />reason why we worded the condition the way we did is because the <br />Development Plan actually does call out for that road, which is <br />constructed as a divider road and a connector road from the subd <br />extension. So, to be consistent with the CDP, that’s why we are <br />road. Whenever we write conditions for zoning, the condition run <br />worded in a way so that whoever owns or develops the land is res <br />conditions. So although DOE and Parker Ranch have their own agre <br />be amended in the future, if they chose, we don’t want to refer <br /> <br />