My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-04-21 Leeward Exh B - DEM
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2011
>
2011-04-21 Leeward Exh B - DEM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 1:59:28 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 1:59:25 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
WHELAN: I mean, its rock, its, at this point its unprocessed <br />you know, thats why we want to, you know, remove it from the si <br />also would like to make a profit while we are doing it because i <br />GIFFIN: I guess my question is of the County, our staff. Jeff, t <br />asking if we have been given a copy of the environmental study. <br />there a reason that we did not, or did I miss it? Was it given t <br />DARROW: No, Madam Chair. As Ivan Torigoe had mentioned, the appl <br />under Chapter 343 and they had received an exemption. If you loo <br />applicant, there is a Declaration of Exemption, which goes into <br />review for the request of the exemption, and -. <br />GIFFIN: Jeff, can you tell us what page thats on? <br />DARROW: I dont think there is its within the application I <br />pages. Its after the site plan. <br />GIFFIN: Yeah, yeah. <br />DARROW: The No. 4 under well, let me get here within the Dec <br />have a memorandum that is attached, and under Roman numeral II, <br />sorry yes, under Roman numeral II, if you look at No. 4 under <br />says Consultation With Other Agencies, the applicant had consu <br />regarding this request for exemption. So it just wasnt somethin <br />Department of Environmental Management; the exemption list was t <br />they had consulted with many different departments regarding thi <br />Planning Department, as well as many other agencies that are lis <br />why there was no environmental assessment attached to the applic <br />GIFFIN: Okay, thank you. And I guess my other question is of Iva <br />from the testifiers regarding why not an open bid, I mean, is th <br />contemplate, or no? <br />TORIGOE: I think the general concern that we have, as stated by <br />regulated landfill, and so if at all possible I think both the C <br />like to avoid having private contractors who would be doing any <br />operations on the landfill because we want to make sure that the <br />violation of any of the landfill conditions. <br />If I may add also that if there is a real concern about the volu <br />or sold, I think, you know, we are stating repeatedly that all w <br />rock that is produced as a byproduct. So if, you know, there wou <br />simply states that there would be no excavation of rock beyond t <br />operations, and no sale of rock beyond what is necessary to main <br />would have a problem with that. Thats what we are representing. <br />GIFFIN: Any other questions of the applicant. Lani? Commissioner <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.