My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-04-22 tHuggett (fka Soto SMA 03-007)2
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-04-22 tHuggett (fka Soto SMA 03-007)2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 2:08:15 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 2:08:08 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
updated as often as maybe it should be. So its quite often, so when I submit an application for <br />somebody who has, whos not listed in the Real Property Tax site, I always ask for a copy of <br />their deed so that I dont get the letter back from the Planning Department saying gee our records <br />show that your client doesnt own the property. So the fact that theres discrepancies does not <br />surprise me. But in this case, I think Mr. Buscemi and Mr. Haney obviously were very aware of <br />the hearing. Not only that they also have an opportunity to file a Contested Case previously. <br />KIM:Mr. Chairman, mayIjust briefly respond to- <br />GALDONES:Mr. Kim. <br />KIM:Number 1 is, if I could as point of personal privilege or request whether or <br />not Mr. Mooers has put into the record that he received a private conversation with Mr. Hayashi <br />indicating that he need not comply with the Planning Directors letter. And my question for, I <br />wouldasktheChairtoaskiswhetherornotthisMarch23,2005letteronCountystationarywas <br />ever rescinded formally by any letter or the like because thats- that would be important for our <br />case and with regard to my clients and Mr. Mooers comments as to the mailing list, theres no <br />question we got notice. We got notice through Mr. Yuens letter. However the question for the <br />Commission is what about those other individuals who are adjoining property owners, who are <br />not here, who did not get notice. Thats the question I think is not really focused on. Thank you <br />Mr. Chairman. <br />GALDONES:Obviously Commissioners and also the applicants here. We would like to <br />do the right thing in moving forward. However, in light of the discussion, the ongoing <br />discussion I know that I realize that there are seems to be some legal obstacles that we need to <br />overcome in making some kind of decision in the direction we are going. In order to do that, <br />Commissioners we would have to confer with our legal Counsel, however I am in no position to <br />make a motion for an Executive Session that would be- however, the Chair is allowed to <br />entertain that motion for the- the Commissioners feel comfortable with that. Commissioner <br />Iwashita? <br />IWASHITA:I move for a recess for Executive Session. <br />GALDONES:And could you state the purposes for the record. <br />IWASHITA:For purpose of consulting with our attorney regarding the issues raised <br />presently before us by Mr. Kim. <br />GALDONES:Is there a second? <br />SPRINGER:Second. <br />GALDONES:It was moved by Commissioner Iwashita and seconded by Commissioner <br />Springer that we go into Executive Session. Commissioner Graham? <br />16 <br />EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.