Laserfiche WebLink
GALDONES:Mr. Haney? <br />HANEY:Yes, thank you. Actually 2 issues. One regarding, in speaking as an <br />engineer and Im not a lawyer, I could see that if there was a case, this was a specific case out in <br />the rural area where the ownership does not change and a permit was filed and it was continued <br />for 5 years and none of the parties in the permit had changed that hey you might just say lets let <br />that slide and well continue the permit. Thats not the case in this case, its been a year and a <br />half, at least 20 units have sold at Sea Village in that period. Two of them are the most affected <br />units in our building. One of them is going to lose 50% of its viewplane. These people are <br />outraged, theyre incense and they have not been informed about this. So I ask you to consider <br />them when youre making your decision. The other issue I wanted to respond to Mr. Mooers <br />about mine and Mr. Buscemis chance for a Contested Case, yes we did get a chance and our Sea <br />Village Board was negotiating with the previous owner Mr. Soto and Vacation Internationale. <br />WewereaskednottofileaseparateContestedCasebecauseitwouldmuddythewaters.And <br />we said fine, well let our Board handle it theyll take care of us so none of the owners filed their <br />own Contested Cases. Two months later our Board decides that due to legal reasons that they <br />cant represent us so now were left high and dry with no Contested Case. Now I know thats <br />not your fault, its not Mr. Huggetts fault but what Im asking that you consider the fact that 18 <br />owners signed a letter to you that said we are still concerned about this whether our Board agrees <br />with us or not. I would be happy to send our Board a hundred bucks and Ill pick up their <br />Contested Case just the way the Huggetts picked up the permit. Thank you. <br />GALDONES:Commissioners are there any further questions or discussion? <br />Commissioner Springer? <br />SPRINGER:A question for either the Planning Department Staff or Director Yuen, <br />st <br />when was the error realized regarding the March 31 <br /> letter? <br />HAYASHI:As soon as I believe Mr. Mooers received the letter he had contacted me <br />by telephone andhe brought that to my attention. And at that point in time I told him yes, it was <br />an error on our part by including that particular section in the letter. And, I need to confirm that <br />yes, we did not send a subsequent letter over to Mr. Mooers indicating that- that this, that <br />portions of the letter was incorrect. <br />SPRINGER:Either to Mr. Mooers or to anyone else on the circulation list? The copy <br />ofthisletter,Idontseemtohaveitinmypacket,wasdirectedtoMr.Mooerswasit?The <br />st <br />March 31 letter? <br />HAYASHI:I cant quite hear you Im sorry. <br />st <br />SPRINGER:The March 31 letter was directed to Mr. Mooers? <br />HAYASHI:That is correct. And we also copied, out of courtesy to Mr. Buscemi and <br />Mr.Haney,theAssociationofApartmentOwnersattheSeaVillageandIbelievealso,theKona <br />office and Mr. Huggett. <br />19 <br />EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />