My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-04-22 TUmphrey REZ 03-032
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-04-22 TUmphrey REZ 03-032
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 2:08:18 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 2:08:14 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
year storm. So if you wanted to address something with a higher recurrence interval we would <br />have to make that a special condition. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. <br />GALDONES;Commissioners any further questions? Hearing none, thank you Mr. <br />Herbert. <br />Mr. Umphrey having heard the testimony do you have any closing statements that you would <br />like to make? <br />UMPHREY:No Mr. Chairman. I think we fully understand the implications of a <br />project like this in a bottleneck area of Honalo. But, we feel that so far everything is being <br />addressed and we don€t have any concerns. I think it will work its way through and eventually <br />allthesemattersaregoingtobe-willberesolved. <br />GALDONES:Thankyou.CommissionersanyfinalquestionsforMr.Umphrey? <br />Hearing none, Commissioners it comes with a recommendation from the Planning Director that <br />it be favorably recommended and forwarded to the County Council bearing in mind also that <br />there were amendments that were made to Conditions F on the third line conversion be replaced <br />by the word construction and also a TIAR be required for construction of a convenience store <br />and also the TIAR may be waived. There also was an amendment to Condition H, in reference <br />to sight distance meeting the approval of the Department of Public Works. <br />IWASHITA:Mr. Chair. <br />GALDONES:Commissioner Iwashita? <br />IWASHITA:This is a procedural clarification. Is it appropriate in the order of business <br />to- for the Commission to consider a motion for unfavorable recommendation to the County <br />Council on the matter? <br />YUEN:Yes, at this point the Commission can have a discussion about what it <br />wants to do. If the Commission wants to make an unfavorable recommendation then that is the <br />Commission€s prerogative. We would ask on the Department side that the people- and this is <br />true with respect to a recommendation like this and even more true with respect to a permit. If <br />the Commission wants to go unfavorable when the Department is favorable, the Commissioners <br />who are making the motion explain the reasons for that. And this is because, the end result we <br />will, we also serve the Commission and we will put together a letter for the County Council that <br />explains why the Commission did what it did. So, if the Commission makes a recommendation <br />that follows the staff recommendation we recycle the staff recommendation and send it up to the <br />County Council unless the Commission has wanted to put in something different. If the <br />Commission is making, wants to make an unfavorable recommendation then the Commission <br />should have some discussion and give us some explanation and then we will put that together for <br />the County Council. <br />12 <br />EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.