My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-04-22 TUmphrey REZ 03-032
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-04-22 TUmphrey REZ 03-032
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 2:08:18 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 2:08:14 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
zoning. There has been previous rezonings in the area that occurred in the late 60s up to the <br />80s from Residential to Village Commercial. The applicants are here today. They were able to <br />resolve fire flow requirements which resulted in the continuance. They have been able to agree <br />to install sprinkler systems to resolve fire flow requirements for the fire department in the <br />projects buildings. The applicants Jack and Barbara Umphrey are requesting a change of zone <br />from Single Family Residential 7500 square feet to Village Commercial 7500 square feet. If I <br />can direct your attention to the plot plan that was submitted. The applicants are proposing to <br />convert an existing dwelling on the property to offices for office use and are proposing to <br />construct 2 new structures on the property on the eastern boundary for mixed use purposes. At <br />this time it is unknown as to specifically what those uses will be. They are also proposing to put <br />in a 27 space parking lot including 2 handicap stalls. A condition to bring to your attention is <br />Condition E and this states that the effective date of this ordinance will be upon either the <br />completion of the Mamalahoa Highway Bypass Road from Keauhou to Napoopoo Junction or <br />the completion of Mamalahoa Highway improvements along the subject frontage of the property <br />includingacontinuance2-laneleftturnlanethatwillbeabletoallowfortheflowoftrafficin <br />fronting the subject property. Until one of these actions occur the property will remain in its <br />current zoning of RS 7.5. <br />We have received several letters of opposition to the project. One of them, or correction two of <br />them were submitted previously from George and Elaine Harai as well as Shari Jumalon and this <br />morning weve received 2 additional letters. One from Janice Bovard and that one has been <br />passed out and weve also received one from Jerry Herbert and Nancy Redfeather and this one, <br />there was only one copy so if I could summarize. They are concerned regarding the water runoff <br />of the project. They say that this particular project is located near the Kawanui Floodway and <br />that theyre requesting that all development generated runoff water be disposed of on-site and <br />shall not be directed toward any adjacent properties and that a drainage study be prepared by a <br />licensed civil engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works and approved prior to <br />issue of any permits. We do have a condition that addresses this matter. This is a condition <br />within the change of zone conditions. <br />The Planning Director is recommending a favorable recommendation be forwarded to the Hawaii <br />County Council by the Planning Commission. Are there any questions? <br />GALDONES:Commissioners any questions of Jeff? Commissioner Graham? <br />GRAHAM:Jeff, before when you outlined the 2 sides to Condition E with regard to <br />the highway and all, obviously the first part which was the opening of the Mamalahoa Bypass <br />nd <br />Road is not under the control of the applicant. How about the 2 <br /> half of that, about the <br />Mamalahoa Highway improvements along the subject frontage? Are those improvements totally <br />under the control of the- or are they generally under the control of the applicant or are they some <br />thinghehastowaitfor? <br />DARROW:Ibelievethattheimprovementswouldfaroutweighthecostoftheproject <br />so this would be something that they would have to wait for to happen. Probably regarding <br />improvementsbytheCounty.IfyoudlikeIcanaskKiifyouwantto- <br />2 <br />EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.