Laserfiche WebLink
Road then that€s sort of where it€s going to be. So is it possible to have adequate sight distance <br />with that being the entrance is what it seems like is what Ms. Springer is asking. <br />EMLER:We did take a look at the site. The question is whether or not- I€m sorry, <br />let me see if I can rephrase. If I understand your question, you want to know if adequate sight <br />distance can be provided at the site at the location across from Saint Paul€s Road. Is that the <br />question? <br />GRAHAM:Yes, well sort of. Distance is distance, if the locations there, the distance <br />is fixed there€s no way you can mess around with that but maybe you can mess around with what <br />would impede sight and so my question just was is there a way that the sighting can be <br />acceptable if that is the location that we€re putting here. <br />EMLER:Without actually doing a detailed survey, sight distance study on the site <br />whichwouldincludesomesurveyingwork,Iwouldnotbeabletoelaborateonallofthe <br />remedial requirements for meeting that. <br />GRAHAM:I don€t need that. I just want- I mean there are remedial possibilities so <br />that it could work at that location is all I€m asking. <br />EMLER:Yeah, if the question is, is there adequate sight distance there now, I would <br />say no. There will be remedial work needed and it could include having to obtain a sight <br />distance easement from the adjoining property to obtain that. <br />GRAHAM:Okay thank you. <br />GALDONES:Commissioners any further questions? Commissioner Iwashita? <br />IWASHITA:Thank you. I have a request for clarification. This road or highway <br />improvement condition, it seems to me that, that€s going to be something years and years down <br />the road to be met and I just wanted some kind of indication if there€s an estimate as to how <br />long, the earliest of either of these improvements could possibly take place? <br />DARROW:Thank you Commissioner Iwashita, if I could ask the Planning Director if <br />he could address his question? Thank you. <br />YUEN:The Mamalahoa bypass was approximately 3/5ths complete when <br />construction was stopped by the Courts injunction in September, 2003. There are 3 issues with <br />the completion of the Mamalahoa bypass. Number 1 the Court in the Hokulia case enjoined <br />further construction within the boundaries of the Hokulia project. That€s where they were <br />working on it at the time, so that put it to a stop. Second problem is that at the, near the Halekii <br />Intersection there€s a burial site. And the DLNR has not made a determination of what, how that <br />is to be handled. It€s a inadvertent burial and so the decision is with the DLNR. If it can€t be <br />relocated or built over then the road needs to be realigned. Third issue is that the County still has <br />to condemn 1 parcel in the right-of-way, that€s the Coupe property. If the Court injunction were <br />say dissolved by the Supreme Court and all issues related to litigation went away tomorrow, the <br />5 <br />EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />