2005-04-22 TUmphrey REZ 03-032 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

GALDONES:Mr. Yuen. YUEN:And just to explain briefly that, I think the convenience store issue is self explanatory. This is something that was requested by the Department of Public Works. At this- the last sentence gives DPW the power to waive the TIAR when they actually look at the application because it may be that, theres something different than what was presented but, DPW looks at it and says look this does not warrant having a full traffic study. And so, the way it was worded it didnt seem to give DPW any discretion not to ask for a TIAR. So thats the purpose of the last sentence. And I think theres one slight change as well, in the first sentence in F. where it talks about conversion of two buildings of approximately 1100 square feet each for office or retail use that should be construction of two buildings because those are not existing buildings. The first building that we talk about there is a conversion, the conversion of a home to office. The second, theyre proposing construction of new buildings rather than conversion. GALDONES:Mr.UmphreyhavingheardtheamendmenttoConditionFdoyouhave any comments to that amendment? UMPHREY:No I dont. GALDONES:Commissioner Graham? GRAHAM:Mr. Umphrey, maybe you heard us, Im sure you heard us when we were asking questions before. At least a couple of us have some concerns about the actual rezoning couldnt take effect until some time in the future based on these roadway things and so, obviously one thing were weighing in our minds is whether its appropriate to approve it now or whether it should be resubmitted at such a time when it can take effect more immediately. Do you have any comments on, you know, how that impacts you and how you feel about that discussion? UMPHREY:Well, as an owner of the property if its not approved at this time subject to the conditions then I would expect that the property would likely be resold and we would just withdraw our interest in having this property rezoned. We have an interest in the property immediately north of this present, and were trying to make decisions on what makes sense with both properties together. So if we were to turn this one, if you were to say you want us to come back and reapply 2 or 3 years from now, I couldnt give you an answer on that, whether we would or we wouldnt, I dont know at this point. GALDONES:Commissioners any further questions of Mr. Umphrey? Seeing none. Mr. Umphrey you may stay there, however there are 2 individuals who have signed up to testify, Jerry Herbert and Jan Bovard. Could you please come forward. HERBERT:Hello, my name is- GALDONES:I need to swear the both of you in. Mr. Umphrey could you loan the microphone to, kind of move it down to Ms. Bovard please. Thank you. Could you please raise 9 EXHIBIT A