2005-04-22 tkic4-22 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

question of allocating it. And how weve been operating over the past 5 to 8 years nowis that as projects within the Keauhou Resort develop out and they go in for their Plan Approvals likefor instance when the multi-family project you go in for a Plan Approval. The Department of Water Supply will be asked to allocate say 16 water commitments to this project and theyll send in a letter confirming that. So weve done that, like I say over the past 5 to 8 years now. Its just, what the water department wants to do is to enter into a formal agreement with us regarding how we- how we get- how we allocate the water from the mauka system coming down now. So its not a question of do we have um, its just there issue I think is they want to see us allocate it and we are in the process of doing that agreement. GRAHAM:Thank you. GALDONES:Seeing that there is no further questions? Mr. Lim, there is a person who signed up to testify. So if we could relinquish the chairs I would appreciate it. I would like to callatthistime,ElizabethMeyerson. ANONYMOUS:(voiceofwomansittinginaudience)Mrs.Meyersonleft.Hertestimony was similar to the water supply issue she gave earlier. GALDONES:Okay. Commissioners are there any further questions of Mr. Lim? Mr. Lim is there any closing remarks? LIM:I think that the project that youre looking at today Commissioners is basically an in-field project. Were developing less than 1/3 of the maximum density on the project. We ask for your support. Weve addressed the Kahaluu Historic District issues. There is a small portion of site 46-24 thats located within the very small portion of the project out there on the top left hand portion of the diagram thats on Exhibit 4 in our application. Youll see that the site itself is on the next door property, which is the Keauhou Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center. The one that everybody still calls the Hill Haven project. But the buffer extends into this project. It will not be affected by the development of this project as there is a sewer easement that runs from- between the archaeological site buffer and the development. So we received the State Historic Preservation clearance for that element and we ask the Commissions support in this application. Thank you. GALDONES:Thank you. Hearing no further questions, no more discussions- Commissioners it comes with a recommendation from the Planning Director for approval by the- recommendation for approval by the Planning Commission. Commissioner Graham? GRAHAM:Just one small issue for the Planning Director. I think in our Background Report that was- it was clear that they intend to connect to their own sewage treatment system and all but- And sewage is obviously an SMA issue but I dont see that in any of the conditions. Is that missing for any particular reason? YUEN:Why dont we add that as a condition. Theres a practical matter they would have to do that as a multi-family building with the Department of Health but it should be a condition. 4 EXHIBIT C