Laserfiche WebLink
DARROW:We do have a request for a continuance. It appears that if you <br />folks feel that the petitioner has, at this time, enough standing I would see the opportunity <br />to vote on that at this time. But if you feel that there are questions that need to be asked <br />maybe at this, maybe we should look at a continuance. <br />FUJIKAWA:Mr. Chair -? <br />GALDONES:Commissioner Fujikawa. <br />FUJIKAWA:Yeah, if that’s the case, I would like to make a motion to continue <br />this hearing and give it a chance so we could listen to the intervenor. <br />GALDONES:There is a motion by Commissioner Fujikawa to grant Mr. Wong a <br />continuance. Is there a second to his motion? <br />SPRINGER:Second. Discussion? <br />FUJIKAWA:Discussion? <br />GALDONES:Seconded by Commissioner Springer. Discussion, Commission <br />Springer? <br />SPRINGER:The motion as worded indicates that Mr. Wong is an intervenor <br />and we haven’t decided upon that yet. So I would suggest that motion be amended to <br />reflect Mr. Wong by name rather than as the intervenor. <br />GALDONES:Commissioner Fujikawa? <br />FUJIKAWA:Okay. <br />GALDONES:It has been accepted by Commissioner Fujikawa that the motion <br />shall be amended to recognize Mr. Wong not as an intervenor. Commissioner Springer? <br />SPRINGER:If we grant the continuance and Mr. Wong has the opportunity then <br />to come forward and any of his colleagues and they can come to us and they can hear the <br />discussion before us, are we required then to accept them as intervenors or will we be <br />taking that up immediately when they are able to sit with us? <br />GALDONES:Ms. O’Toole? <br />O’TOOLE:No, you do not. You have to vote on their petition to intervene, <br />whether it’s continued or not, you know. <br />SPRINGER:And then will we do that at the next meeting then on this matter? <br />O’TOOLE:Whenever it is put on again. <br />6 <br /> <br />