Laserfiche WebLink
roadway. So that alone in itself will never be covered by the impact fee assessment. And, you <br />know, in my mind I dont think that this project will be a viable one. And, of course, as I <br />indicated earlier I hope, I had wished that this project was before us on its own merits and not <br />tied in together with the zoning, you know, either/or. And same with the rezoning, I hoped it had <br />come before us on its own merits, and the housing program with its own merits, so that we can <br />look at that more objectively and really single out and focus on the necessary issues that we need <br />to, so that it can be a viable one. With that I would go along with the motion. <br />GRAHAM:Thank you. Commissioner Rho? <br />th <br />RHO:I think that the Directors April 27 letter to Lorraine Mendoza I think <br />really sums up the parcel that they want to use to build those affordable housing. And for me <br />that letter answered all my questions regarding the affordable housing. My real concern is on the <br />other five or six parcels that are going to be subdivided from 20 to 10. And Im a fairly new <br />Commissioner, and I may be not speaking out of turn but may be speaking from ignorance, but <br />in North Kona theres this subdivision thats called Kaloko Mauka; and I believe its 10 acres. <br />And now the residents are coming in to the Planning Commission and asking for a rezoning from <br />10 to 5; and then theyre selling off the 5 making, I would say, $600,000 plus. But, you know, <br />thats the capital market. If I was the neighbor to this project, I would come in to the Planning <br />Commission and ask for rezoning from 20 to 10. And if I was fortunate to buy 10, I would come <br />in and ask for 5. Maybe I wouldnt be the initial person, but I would certainly be the second <br />person to come in. I think were setting a precedent or we would set a precedent with this <br />project. Although I dont know whats around that, you know, I dont know the details of whats <br />completely around this project. But it seemed to me from the visit today there are a number of <br />parcels 20 acres, and theyre all going to come in, cause the general gist of it is that most of them <br />are not farming. Its their primary residence, its their residence. They cannot afford to farm, <br />farming is hard, whatever. But I just want it on the record that thats the reason for my vote. It <br />has nothing to do with affordable housing, nothing to do with the three parcels. I would like it to <br />be connected to the sewer, thats true; but, you know, I could live with it based on the letter from <br />the Director. Thank you. <br />GRAHAM:Thank you, Commissioner Rho. I think the folks in the audience can see <br />that we are certainly independently-minded people here. Everybody caught on to different <br />aspects that was most important to them. Anything further from the Commissioners before we <br />have Jeff take the vote? <br />IWASHITA:Mr. Chair? <br />GRAHAM:Yes, Commissioner Iwashita. <br />IWASHITA:One thing I wanted to mention earlier, and that is in alignment with <br />Commissioner Siracusas reference to the Sustainability Plan for 2050 that Senator Kokubun is <br />chairing, that effort, theres also, you know, I was surprised to hear Governor Lingle talk about <br />changing the basis of how we look at the future of our island and the economy and not relying so <br />much on tourism, and basically what, you know, kind of development that were talking about <br />now. So that also plays into, you know, my view on how we should proceed and how we should <br />view these things. And so that is also a consideration that is driving my vote also. <br />32EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />