Laserfiche WebLink
proceed with what weve got, and then well deal with that in an appropriate manner. Jeff, do <br />you want to continue? <br />DARROW:Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Just to briefly summarize, again we do have <br />two applications before us „ a State Land Use Boundary amendment from Ag to Urban for this <br />particular area of 6.7 acres, which is part of the area in the Change of Zone from Ag-20 to RS- <br />7.5; Hawaiian Rainbows Business Development has entered into an agreement with Hawaii <br />Island Community Development Corporation to be able to allow them to build a 30-lot <br />affordable subdivision. We have two applications: One is a State Land Use Boundary <br />amendment; the other one is a Change of Zone, which encompasses all these actions together „ <br />Agricultural 20-acres to RS-7.5 for 6.7 acres, the remainder of the parcel from Ag-20 to Ag-5 <br />and then a larger parcel of 118 acres from Ag-20 to Ag-10. The entire project is approximately <br />140 acres in size. <br />TherecommendationofthePlanningDirectoratthistimeisthatthePlanningCommissionsend <br />a favorable recommendation for these applications to the Hawaii County Council. Are there any <br />questions? <br />GRAHAM:Thank you, Jeff. Yes, Commissioner Watanabe? <br />WATANABE:I have a question for, I guess, the Director really, and its more for <br />clarification purposes because we just took that site visit this morning. And it seems clear to me <br />that Soil Conservation had the developer create some berms, etc. to reduce the potential for <br />flooding, and to conserve the soil obviously. And irrespective of what this application states, <br />because with the additional material that we got from the developer as well as the site visit and <br />the topo map that we recently got, you know, the application states 30 houses, but irrespective of <br />how the application came in, we would never allow any building in an AE flood zone anyway. <br />And so Im wanting to make sure that, you know -. Typically the system has other checks and <br />balances within it, which means that potentially the subdivision would have been downsized, <br />even if we had approved it as it had come in. <br />YUEN:Right. Its quite common that an area would be residentially zoned and <br />well have areas that have to be set aside for a drainage way within the RS zoning. Part of the <br />Subdivision Code says that the subdivider has to lay out watercourses and drainage ways within <br />the subdivision, and set them aside in drainage easements. So we see this quite commonly that it <br />wasnt necessarily determined at the time of zoning where the drainage ways would be, but that <br />its taken care of in the subdivision approval in the subdivision stage. <br />GRAHAM:Any other questions from the Commissioners at this point? <br />DOMINGO:Mr. Chairman, if I may? <br />GRAHAM:Yes, Commissioner Domingo. <br />DOMINGO:With speaking of building drainage ways and other factors tied in with the <br />development I just have one question. Would the cost of all of those infrastructure be tagged <br />onto the cost of the homes? <br />4EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />