My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-05-04 TPITTULO
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-05-04 TPITTULO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 2:17:36 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 2:17:33 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
WATANABE:Second. <br />GRAHAM:And, Commissioner Alameda, we did have a little change to this <br />Condition C with regard to meeting the fire requirements. You wanted to go with that change or <br />want clarification from Jeff? <br />ALAMEDA:No. I understand the change; and Id like to go with that change as part of <br />the motion. Do you need to rewrite or, go ahead. <br />GRAHAM:Hold a second. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. <br />GRAHAM:Mr.Yuen? <br />YUEN:Yeah,Ithinkweneedtorewriteit;andIverewrittensomething. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay,canIheartheDirectorslanguage. <br />YUEN:ItwouldbeinaccordancewiththeDepartmentofWaterSupplys <br />Standards, the applicants shall extend a second inch, okay, wait. Let me start again. Were <br />going to start with the beginning being the same. But for the sake of clarity Im going to start <br />reading the whole thing from the beginning and then Ill stop when we start to change it. Okay, <br />In accordance with the Department of Water Supplys Standards, the applicants shall extend a <br />second 8-inch waterline along Ponahawai Street from the existing 12-inch waterline within <br />Komohana Street to obtain the 2,000 GPM fire flow requirement and then this is new prior to <br />the establishment of uses not allowed under the A-1a zone. Okay? So they can do the things <br />that they could do under their current zoning without extending the waterline. All right, then <br />new sentence, and this is to cover what they just asked for, The applicant may have the <br />alternative of converting the dwelling currently under construction to commercial use without <br />extending the waterline, provided it meets all fire flow requirements of the Fire Department. <br />GRAHAM:Thank you, Mr. Yuen. <br />ALAMEDA:Just checking, is there anything about certificate of occupancy? Do we <br />need to mention that or is it implied? <br />GRAHAM:Do we need anything additional, Mr. Yuen? <br />YUEN:Let me look at that first. <br />GRAHAM:Okay. <br />YUEN:Well, to me its implied. <br />ALAMEDA:Mr. Chair, can I check with the applicant to see if that language is okay? <br />11EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.