My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-05-04 TMILLER
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-05-04 TMILLER
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 2:17:44 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 2:17:40 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
YUEN:It looks to me like its a considerable distance beyond the drainage <br />easement and well into your building. <br />ROSS:Okay. So what Im looking at then iswhen the subdivision was approved <br />they approved a legal drainage easement that didnt match the 100-year zone, is that correct? <br />YUEN:Thats correct. <br />ROSS:So was that an error on the Countys part? Is that practice from the <br />County? <br />YUEN:It was an error in somebody not recognizing that the subdividers drainage <br />easement as laid out didnt match the flood zone. <br />ROSS:And this latest subdivision application was approved in the last five years, <br />I think, wasnt it? <br />YUEN:Thats right. The tentative was in 1999. The final was in either 2001 or <br />2002. <br />ROSS:Okay, so in the last five years this has happened? <br />YUEN:Yes. <br />MILLER:Id also like to make a comment that there have been improvements to the <br />upstream drainage into a channel, I believe, in 2001. So much of the flow that had gone through <br />that property was rechanneled into the main artery of drainage I believe south of that, I dont <br />know the name of the channel. But I believe there was rechanneling and reassessment of the <br />flood zone after that. I believe there were also a couple of studies done to that, which I may or <br />may not be able to provide you with today. <br />YUEN:Yes. Theres a process for changing the map; and if you change the map, <br />then where the line is changes, then you can build in a different place. But as it stands, -. <br />ROSS:Okay, so Im looking at the staffs work here. Youd be opened to an <br />independent review of this layout and comparing to see if this is -? I mean, I dont know how <br />they produced this, you know, with a light table or how they did it. I know how we do it in our <br />office. Im just going to say, well have, theres room to discuss what this actual map is. <br />YUEN:Right, in the sense theres no -. <br />ROSSInotherwords,wecangetyouacertifiedengineer,withmeasacertified <br />engineertoreviewthemapsanddecidewherethatboundaryis.Becauseitsalarge-scalemap <br />thatssuperimposedontheseTMKsandtheressome,howshouldIputit,theressome <br />engineeringjudgmentusedtoactuallylocatethoselines. <br />YUEN:Iunderstand.AndifitDPWtellsusthattheAzoneisinaslightly <br />differentlocationthanshownonthismap,wellrespectthat. <br />ROSS:Right.Sowellworkwiththemtogetthatfinalized. <br />YUEN:Right. <br />MILLER:Right. And Id like to make one other comment. The date on that <br />particular map is 1988. As I mentioned, there were drainage improvements uphill from this <br />9EXHIBIT C <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.