My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-05-05 THui-o-mana
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-05-05 THui-o-mana
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 2:20:00 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 2:19:56 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ALAMEDA:All right, Fellow Commissioners, its our time to discuss, or we can make <br />a motion and discuss. Commissioner Graham? <br />GRAHAM:Basically, to me, an application like this could go either way, you know, <br />vote up or vote down. We have rules for when special permits should be approved and we have <br />criteria to address, and like we got seven different criteria here. It doesnt say every one of them <br />has got to be met. But, you know, some of them say the desired use shall not adversely affect <br />surrounding properties. So if the surrounding property owners feel that its a problem with the <br />roads and safety, then I have to take what they say more seriously than what I might think. <br />Another condition is the land upon which the proposed use is sought is unsuited for the uses <br />permitted within the district, and certainly Ag uses are permitted, but we do allow lots of special <br />permits where theres good Ag potential. So, again, you know, as far as the laws are concerned, <br />I think we have ample justification to go either way. <br />ButthethingthatbothersmeatthispointisIdontfeellikeIshouldvotetoapproveaspecial <br />permit unless the surrounding community supports it; and in this case I dont see that at this <br />point. We have some testimony, some of which we got to today and all of which I have not read <br />yet just because we didnt have time today. But in order for me to support this it needs better <br />support from the surrounding community than I see at this point. <br />ALAMEDA:Other thoughts before we entertain a motion? Commissioner Iwashita. <br />IWASHTIA:I generally concur with what Commissioner Graham has stated and Im <br />prepared to make a motion if the Chair wishes. <br />ALAMEDA:I wish. <br />IWASHITA:I move that the application for Special Permit Docket No. SPP 06-000024, <br />Special Permit to allow the establishment of a Health and Wellness Retreat Facility on a 3.167- <br />acre area situated on Tax Map Key: 4-4-13: portion of 10 be denied based upon the reasons <br />stated by Commissioner Graham, as well as the fact that there is general community opposition <br />to the proposal. <br />ALAMEDA:Let me just check with counsel. I know when we make a recommendation <br />or a motion to deny, our reasons would have to be stated. But Im just wondering if those <br />reasons are specific enough. Mr. Torigoe? <br />TORIGOE:Thank you, Mr. Chair. Im afraid I was out on a telephone call when <br />Mr. Graham was speaking. But basically thats a concern, is that because the recommendation <br />from the Director was for an approval if there is a denial then we will have to try and spell out as <br />specifically as possible the reasons why. So if the record is pretty clear on that, thats fine. If <br />you want to, you know, spell it out more specifically that will be helpful. <br />IWASHITA:I can be more specific. The reasons include the traffic concerns expressed <br />on the record in testimony presented for the body. There are residual concerns about meeting <br />Department of Health regulations in compliance with the proposed operation -. <br />SALAVEA:Liability. <br />24EXHIBIT D <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.