Laserfiche WebLink
ALAMEDA:All right, Fellow Commissioners, it€s our time to discuss, or we can make <br />a motion and discuss. Commissioner Graham? <br />GRAHAM:Basically, to me, an application like this could go either way, you know, <br />vote up or vote down. We have rules for when special permits should be approved and we have <br />criteria to address, and like we got seven different criteria here. It doesn€t say every one of them <br />has got to be met. But, you know, some of them say the desired use shall not adversely affect <br />surrounding properties. So if the surrounding property owners feel that it€s a problem with the <br />roads and safety, then I have to take what they say more seriously than what I might think. <br />Another condition is the land upon which the proposed use is sought is unsuited for the uses <br />permitted within the district, and certainly Ag uses are permitted, but we do allow lots of special <br />permits where there€s good Ag potential. So, again, you know, as far as the laws are concerned, <br />I think we have ample justification to go either way. <br />ButthethingthatbothersmeatthispointisIdon€tfeellikeIshouldvotetoapproveaspecial <br />permit unless the surrounding community supports it; and in this case I don€t see that at this <br />point. We have some testimony, some of which we got to today and all of which I have not read <br />yet just because we didn€t have time today. But in order for me to support this it needs better <br />support from the surrounding community than I see at this point. <br />ALAMEDA:Other thoughts before we entertain a motion? Commissioner Iwashita. <br />IWASHTIA:I generally concur with what Commissioner Graham has stated and I€m <br />prepared to make a motion if the Chair wishes. <br />ALAMEDA:I wish. <br />IWASHITA:I move that the application for Special Permit Docket No. SPP 06-000024, <br />Special Permit to allow the establishment of a Health and Wellness Retreat Facility on a 3.167- <br />acre area situated on Tax Map Key: 4-4-13: portion of 10 be denied based upon the reasons <br />stated by Commissioner Graham, as well as the fact that there is general community opposition <br />to the proposal. <br />ALAMEDA:Let me just check with counsel. I know when we make a recommendation <br />or a motion to deny, our reasons would have to be stated. But I€m just wondering if those <br />reasons are specific enough. Mr. Torigoe? <br />TORIGOE:Thank you, Mr. Chair. I€m afraid I was out on a telephone call when <br />Mr. Graham was speaking. But basically that€s a concern, is that because the recommendation <br />from the Director was for an approval if there is a denial then we will have to try and spell out as <br />specifically as possible the reasons why. So if the record is pretty clear on that, that€s fine. If <br />you want to, you know, spell it out more specifically that will be helpful. <br />IWASHITA:I can be more specific. The reasons include the traffic concerns expressed <br />on the record in testimony presented for the body. There are residual concerns about meeting <br />Department of Health regulations in compliance with the proposed operation -. <br />SALAVEA:Liability. <br />24EXHIBIT D <br /> <br />