My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-05-05 THirayama
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-05-05 THirayama
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 2:21:25 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 2:21:21 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
TORIGOE:Well, I think if its clear what your intent is, you know. And what youre <br />basically expressing is something that would be on the record that because of various <br />circumstances it is not apparently possible to get a five-vote positive recommendation at this <br />point but that the intent is to move this on to Council. And the entire record would be sent up to <br />the Council sothat your individual comments regarding the merits of the matter would be on the <br />record. <br />GRAHAM:Yes, Mr. Yuen? <br />YUEN:Can I butt in on this? <br />GRAHAM:Yes, please. <br />YUEN:I would recommend against that. Your role is to consider the matter, to <br />takeavote,andtotrytomakeafavorableorunfavorablerecommendation.Idontlikehaving <br />these come back repeatedly before the Commission; but I also dont think that theres, its not an <br />imperative -. The rules provide for these to be at the Commission for 90 days. I dont think its <br />imperative that it be voted out on the first time. And I dont want to encourage the <br />Commissioners to vote no on a, to vote against an application when they are actually in favor of <br />it. <br />GRAHAM:Yes, I would personally concur with the Planning Director. To me that <br />would be like gaming the system role; and I dont feel like I want to be doing any gaming. So I <br />guess my sense is, you know, I would prefer that we take a recess for lunch and have <br />Commissioner Alameda come back and let him decide whether he feels its appropriate for him <br />to vote on this along with the rest of us. But I certainly do not feel like I should call any recess, <br />unless youre all in agreement. And if Commissioner Iwashita doesnt like that plan or if any of <br />the others of you dont like that plan, I will withdraw that suggestion; and well go ahead and <br />take a vote. <br />IWASHITA:Lets eat. <br />GRAHAM:Pardon? <br />IWASHITA:Lets eat. <br />GRAHAM:Lets eat. Well, thank you. <br />RECESSEDThe Chair called a recess at 11:57 a.m. <br />RECONVENEDThemeetingreconvenedat1:15p.m. <br />ALAMEDA:WillthemeetingofthePlanningCommissionnowcomebackinorder. <br />Aloha, Im back. Thank you, Commissioner Graham, for filling in. So may I ask for kind of an <br />update?If,Mr.Graham,youwouldliketosharewithmewherewereat? <br />GRAHAM:Sure.SowewereconsideringtherecommendationtotheCouncilona <br />rezoning request by Hirayama Brothers. And we didnt have public testimony, but we went <br />14EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.