Laserfiche WebLink
Waiakea Houselots area from Medium and Industrial to Low Density. Then in the mostrecent <br />General Plan Amendment which occurred in 2005 it expanded the Industrial area up to Laukapu <br />Street; and the remaining area which was designated for Low Density back in 1992 was then <br />redesignated to Medium Density. <br />The Interim Amendment that the Planning Director is proposing, I think, you know, all of you <br />are aware of our suggesting some changes also to the Houselots area. One particular change <br />relates to the scaling back of the proposed industrial area along Laukapu Street, you know, <br />pushing it back down to Kalanikoa Street. I kind of recall back about 10 years ago in 1996, <br />1967, thereabouts, the Big Island Candies was going through their rezoning and General Plan <br />amendment process; and at that time the applicant, and I was involved in that, you know, we did <br />meet with the different communities in that area, kumiai rather. And at that time I understand <br />that there was like what is called a Lower Waiakea Houselots Kumiai and also like an Upper <br />Waiakea Houselots Kumiai. Whether these kumiai actually exist today, I don€t know. But in <br />reflectingonthediscussionsthatoccurred,youknow,withthemembersofthekumiaiandtheir <br />officers, the thought was to have more of a mixture of uses in the area of what they called like <br />the Lower Waiakea Houselots Kumiai. And then the dividing line was actually, what€s that <br />street, right where Hilo Motors is on -. <br />HAYASHI:Kekuanaoa. <br />FUKE:Kekuanaoa. Yeah, Kekuanaoa was the dividing line between the Lower <br />and Upper Waiakea Houselots Kumiai. The thought was to have in that area on the makai side <br />of the Houselots area, you know, to be more like a mixture of uses; and for that area on the upper <br />side or the Volcano side of Kekuanaoa Street would be primarily a different form of Residential <br />uses. <br />If you look at the whole concept of Medium Density, in my estimation I think the concept of <br />Medium Density is really like it€s fostering the notion of mixed uses. Historically, you know, <br />when towns or cities used to grow, you have like a mixture of uses. And then came in the early <br />1900s and after like I guess the Supreme Court confirmed the, you know, the city of Euclid <br />(phonetic) versus this guy who wanted to do this kind of industrial development, and the <br />Supreme Court then kind of confirmed that, yes, government has a right to establish zoning. <br />And since that time then the emphasis has been really more like one of segregated land uses. <br />You know, you don€t put industrial uses next to residential, you put commercial uses away from <br />residential, so on and so forth. And it became more like segregated type of uses, as opposed to in <br />years past, you know, you used to have more like a mixture of uses. But more recently, you <br />know, we€ve all heard the terms like new urbanism, the smart growth and all of that stuff; and <br />it€s basically trying to talk about how you want to get away from this so-called automobile <br />culture; and you want to bring, have a mixture of neighborhoods that kind of promote walking, <br />cycling, close to places of jobs and employment, you know. And that€s kind of like the so- <br />called, what they call, like the smart growth kind of theory. Whether we subscribe to that or not, <br />you know, it remains to be seen. <br />But I think that if you look at the concept of the Medium Density, that€s what the Medium <br />Density is really intended to do, trying to provide a mixture of Commercial, Residential, and <br />different forms of residential uses all within a particular area. So I know the Commission has a <br />major task in terms of trying to figure out, well, what kind of uses go where, and all that stuff. <br />4EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />