|
Waiakea Houselots area from Medium and Industrial to Low Density. Then in the mostrecent
<br />General Plan Amendment which occurred in 2005 it expanded the Industrial area up to Laukapu
<br />Street; and the remaining area which was designated for Low Density back in 1992 was then
<br />redesignated to Medium Density.
<br />The Interim Amendment that the Planning Director is proposing, I think, you know, all of you
<br />are aware of our suggesting some changes also to the Houselots area. One particular change
<br />relates to the scaling back of the proposed industrial area along Laukapu Street, you know,
<br />pushing it back down to Kalanikoa Street. I kind of recall back about 10 years ago in 1996,
<br />1967, thereabouts, the Big Island Candies was going through their rezoning and General Plan
<br />amendment process; and at that time the applicant, and I was involved in that, you know, we did
<br />meet with the different communities in that area, kumiai rather. And at that time I understand
<br />that there was like what is called a Lower Waiakea Houselots Kumiai and also like an Upper
<br />Waiakea Houselots Kumiai. Whether these kumiai actually exist today, I dont know. But in
<br />reflectingonthediscussionsthatoccurred,youknow,withthemembersofthekumiaiandtheir
<br />officers, the thought was to have more of a mixture of uses in the area of what they called like
<br />the Lower Waiakea Houselots Kumiai. And then the dividing line was actually, whats that
<br />street, right where Hilo Motors is on -.
<br />HAYASHI:Kekuanaoa.
<br />FUKE:Kekuanaoa. Yeah, Kekuanaoa was the dividing line between the Lower
<br />and Upper Waiakea Houselots Kumiai. The thought was to have in that area on the makai side
<br />of the Houselots area, you know, to be more like a mixture of uses; and for that area on the upper
<br />side or the Volcano side of Kekuanaoa Street would be primarily a different form of Residential
<br />uses.
<br />If you look at the whole concept of Medium Density, in my estimation I think the concept of
<br />Medium Density is really like its fostering the notion of mixed uses. Historically, you know,
<br />when towns or cities used to grow, you have like a mixture of uses. And then came in the early
<br />1900s and after like I guess the Supreme Court confirmed the, you know, the city of Euclid
<br />(phonetic) versus this guy who wanted to do this kind of industrial development, and the
<br />Supreme Court then kind of confirmed that, yes, government has a right to establish zoning.
<br />And since that time then the emphasis has been really more like one of segregated land uses.
<br />You know, you dont put industrial uses next to residential, you put commercial uses away from
<br />residential, so on and so forth. And it became more like segregated type of uses, as opposed to in
<br />years past, you know, you used to have more like a mixture of uses. But more recently, you
<br />know, weve all heard the terms like new urbanism, the smart growth and all of that stuff; and
<br />its basically trying to talk about how you want to get away from this so-called automobile
<br />culture; and you want to bring, have a mixture of neighborhoods that kind of promote walking,
<br />cycling, close to places of jobs and employment, you know. And thats kind of like the so-
<br />called, what they call, like the smart growth kind of theory. Whether we subscribe to that or not,
<br />you know, it remains to be seen.
<br />But I think that if you look at the concept of the Medium Density, thats what the Medium
<br />Density is really intended to do, trying to provide a mixture of Commercial, Residential, and
<br />different forms of residential uses all within a particular area. So I know the Commission has a
<br />major task in terms of trying to figure out, well, what kind of uses go where, and all that stuff.
<br />4EXHIBIT B
<br />
<br />
|