Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Darrow said as requested by the Planning Department the applicant has provided the off-site <br />storage location of the cinder to be used for the applicant’s landscaping business and, <br />additionally, the Planning Department has received a petition for standing in a contested case <br />from Chris Harlan, manager of Big Island Concrete and Aggregate LLC and a surrounding <br />property owner. <br />After the Chair’s explanation of the procedures of a contested case, Mr. Harlan withdrew his <br />petition for standing in a contested case and stated he would just like to provide public <br />testimony. The Chair noted his filing fee will be refunded. <br />The applicant, Mark Jernigan, stated he found after he purchased the property that a special <br />permit was required, noting an insurance company refused to give him liability insurance <br />because of the hazardous steep vertical slopes. He said once the property is brought into a safe <br />condition within the industry standards, they will in the future seek mining the property to go <br />below grade. <br />Upon the Chair’s inquiry, Mr. Jernigan said the five-year life of the permit was acceptable and he <br />understood any further quarrying beyond five years would require another permit. <br />Tracy Crain said they have met with the HOVE Association and adjacent property owners and <br />noted they are aware the permit is for five years and currently the applicant will not mine below <br />the deck and make the existing conditions safer. <br />Chris Harlan, owner of a 15-acre quarry two lots away, expressed his concern of setting a <br />precedent of 1-acre quarries in Ocean View. He noted the HOVE side of the property did not <br />look like it was unsafe but felt the other sides needed to be addressed. <br />The Chair clarified for Mr. Harlan that the request is basically to create a safe situation on three <br />sides of the property and there will be a five-year time limit on the life of the permit. He <br />clarified that the applicant at this time cannot quarry below the deck, and any further quarrying is <br />going to require another permit. <br />As far as Mr. Harlan’s concern of setting a precedent for the area, the Chair noted that any other <br />applications will be considered on a case-by-case basis. The Chair added that this request is an <br />unusual case in that it is a one-acre parcel that is adjacent to an existing mining operation, and <br />the applicants are mitigating an unsafe condition, not that they are setting any precedence. <br />For Commissioner Ishibashi’s information, Mr. Harlan clarified that he does not own the <br />adjacent property, although he did mining for that adjacent landowner and some of the banks <br />were existing at that time. Commissioner Ishibashi noted the adjacent landowner could also <br />come in for a special permit, but right now the Commission is just trying to mitigate an unsafe <br />condition on the subject property. <br />It was moved by Commissioner Domingo and seconded by Commissioner Kern that the <br />application be approved as recommended by the Planning Director, with conditions. <br />Commissioner Kern said he normally would not be in favor of quarrying on a one-acre piece of <br />land unless it’s a very special use, however he felt this was a safety issue and that the <br />3 <br /> <br />