Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Iwashita felt the big problem in Puna was created when all of the substandard <br />subdivisions were approved many years ago, where the relatively inexpensive lands were <br />developed into house lots and not used for agricultural purposes as the zoning indicates. He felt <br />the Puna Community Development Plan is the process that should be used, and approving <br />special permits for ten years would take away the incentive for people to seek the proper zoning. <br />He pointed out that the applicants established the business with their eyes wide open with an <br />initial five-year time extension and with the understanding that the business would move when <br />properly zoned lands became available. He said granting a ten-year extension would be like <br />starting a spot zoning kind of process which he could not support. <br />Commissioner Domingo felt a ten-year time extension should be approved because of the <br />growing need for such necessary services in the development of the Puna area, the applicants are <br />sincerely attempting to establish their business legally, and as they have over a million dollars <br />worth of investments on that property, it would be difficult for them to relocate to another area at <br />this time. He suggested the applicants, meanwhile, pursue a boundary amendment and change of <br />zone to legitimize their business on the subject property rather than going through the special <br />permit route. He felt the Commission should not burden the applicants even more than what <br />they’re faced with at this time. <br />First Vice-Chairman Woodard suggested as a compromise Condition 14 be amended to state: “If <br />the applicant should require an additional extension of time the applicant shall submit a request <br />to the Planning Department for appropriate action,” rather than to the Planning Commission, so <br />that if there is no other urban areas available the Department can grant another five years which <br />could then essentially give the applicants ten years. <br />Upon Director Yuen’s and Commissioner Iwashita’s suggestions, it was moved by <br />Commissioner Domingo and seconded by Commissioner Ogata that Condition No. 14 be <br />amended to read “If the events in Condition No. 5 have not occurred, the Planning Director may <br />administratively extend the life of the permit to not more than five years. If the Planning <br />Director refuses to administratively extend the permit the applicant may submit a request to the <br />Planning Commission for appropriate action. Further, should any of the conditions not be met or <br />substantially complied with in a timely fashion, the Director may initiate procedures to revoke <br />the permit.” Commissioner Bowman said she had concerns of setting a precedent, but she felt <br />this was a good compromise. A roll call vote was taken and motion carried with seven ayes <br />(Domingo, Ogata, Housel, Alameda, Bowman, Iwashita and Woodward) and one absent and <br />excused (Watanabe). <br />SPP 08-000056The Commission took this item up at 9:59 a.m. with <br />SATORUapproximately 11 people from the public in attendance. <br />STEWART MAEDA <br />OLAA, <br />PUNA <br />APPLICANT: SATORU STEWART MAEDA (SPP 08-000056) <br />Special Permit to allow the establishment of a commercial boarding kennel, a quarantine kennel, <br />office, and certified kitchen on 4 acres of land situated within the State Land Use Agricultural <br />District. The property is located off the south side of Ihope Street, approximately 0.7 mile <br />3 <br /> <br />