Laserfiche WebLink
<br />SW: OK. <br /> <br />LT: Leomana – District 3. Um, I just wanted to add in there, I think the important parts of us creating the <br />committee this past year was so that we can get together and talk in like three or four sized people <br />groups without breaking the Sunshine Law. That was like just this past year, I know, we had to create <br />the committees because just talking about stuff outside of the one day of the month that we had <br />was, I guess, needed to be legal. <br /> <br />SW: Well, yes, but your discussions can only be going toward your investigation. It shouldn’t be towards <br />gathering consent one way or another for something that is board business. So you could investigate <br />theoretically what is needed in order for the County to go forward with the boat ramp. What if <br />anything are obstacles with the boat ramp going forward as well as, you know, creation of the <br />seawall and if any advice can be rendered from GMAC in helping with that particular obstacles. It <br />appears that at this point we might not know all of the obstacles that are present for the boat ramp <br />actually being built and/or the seawall being rebuilt so that might be things that you would consider. <br />This is just a suggestion this is not a \[unclear\]. This is your Commission. <br /> <br />AA: Abraham – District 5. So, um, Leomana you’re kind of right but like Sylvia said you just got to talk <br />about what you guys investigating within that committee. Bob Duerr – and then we’re – and so that <br />committee, Bob, is looking, you know, investigating searching for facts and then coming back and <br />reporting to the Commission as you guys just did with the lay net rules and I feel committees is much <br />better than just having you by yourself being the representative for your district and trying to take on <br />that task, right? So now if we get three other commissioners plus two other from the public then <br />they can help you out within your, within the committee’s investigative powers to come back and <br />report to the commission. I think it’s just easier for do the investigative part versus one person versus <br />five or whatever the committee, however much people is in the committee. But, Rob, you gave <br />another good point, um, we just discussed about the Laupahoehoe boat ramp and the seawall but <br />under – at your suggestion to Heather Kimball and because that’s through your whole district, um, do <br />you feel that we should just stay on just the Laupahoehoe boat ramp and seawall investigation and <br />let’s wrap that up first or, um, then next month we can put on Waipio Valley… <br /> <br />RD: Yeah… <br /> <br />AA: ….on another committee next month after you join the Laupahoehoe seawall, ah, committee and <br />then we’ll just cancel that one out and then reconvene as in the months ahead. <br /> <br />RD: You know, Abraham, that makes sense. I mean, keeping it narrow, that makes sense. You know, <br />Laupahoehoe has already been meeting so it shouldn’t be that difficult to get some kind of minutes <br />or consensus or idea of what’s going down. <br /> <br />AA: Right. <br /> <br />RD: Right, ah… <br /> <br />AA: And even like the Waipio one that’s already been investigated through us and, ah, still getting issues <br />going on forward. So that one is kinda serious but that one through GMAC should actually be kind of <br />\[unclear\] too then we can move on to Hakalau and so on and so on down the line. They are all <br />10 <br /> <br /> <br />