My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-08-12 Windward Planning Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Minutes
>
2010
>
2010-08-12 Windward Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 2:25:39 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 2:25:37 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The Chair felt the Department of Water Supply’s requirements to run a 6-inch pipe were <br />ridiculous and that the facility fee or tax of $5500 per lot was excessive, noting this could be a <br />negotiable item. <br />Mr. Akiyama said he has worked out a system meeting the Department of Water Supply’s <br />approval. <br />Mr. Brilhante said the applicant is working with Paul Murray for the surveying work, everything <br />appears to be straightforward, and hopefully the Commission will approve their request. <br />Mr. Akiyama stated he has read the Planning Department’s recommendation and proposed <br />conditions, and they were acceptable. <br />Director Leithead Todd felt Condition M should be clarified to state that the fair share <br />contribution would apply to the additional lots and not to the first home that is already existing. <br />In response to Commissioner Domingo’s inquiry, Ms. Leithead Todd suggested an insertion to <br />Condition M that the fair market value of the road widening required under Condition F be <br />credited toward the required roadway fair share contribution. <br />Henry Giraud, surrounding property owner, expressed his concern that directly across the <br />proposed access to the new lots is a 25-foot sheer dropoff, noting the roadway is narrow and <br />there is a blind hill in the area. He said he has filed a complaint with the Engineering Division of <br />the Department of Public works and to this date nothing has been done. He clarified that the <br />dropoff is on the opposite side of the applicant’s property. <br />Commissioner Domingo expressed his concern of increased density in the area because of the <br />way the GP and LUPAG maps are drawn today. He felt that the Councilman from this district, <br />the landowners and administration should start looking at inclusion of capital improvement <br />projects in the area that may improve the roadway in the near future. <br />The Chair felt working with the DPW on roadways is the way to go; he noted, however, that in <br />Kealakekua they have about 10 miles of sheer dropoffs with no shoulders, no guardrail and <br />people going 45 to 50 miles an hour for decades. He said he did not feel Mr. Giraud’s concerns <br />have a bearing on this application and noted the applicant has changed the format of their <br />driveway because of the concerns expressed. <br />It was then moved by Commissioner Domingo and seconded by Commissioner Kern to send a <br />favorable recommendation to the County Council as recommended by the Planning Director, <br />with the following addition to Condition M, “The fair market value of the road widening <br />required under Condition F shall be credited toward the required roadway fair share contribution <br />in this condition.” In addition, Condition M would be clarified to state that the fair share <br />contribution shall be based on the actual number of additional lots created. A roll call vote was <br />2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.