My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-02-05 Windward Planning Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Minutes
>
2010
>
2010-02-05 Windward Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 2:26:24 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 2:26:22 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Gonzalez agreed with Ms. Leithead Todd that a reconsideratio <br />agendized, and as it is not agendized for today, this matter cannot be addressed. Ms.Leithead <br />Todd referred to a Council situation where the Council could not reconsider an action taken at <br />a previous meeting because it was not agendized. Mr. Rees noted that situation occurred <br />because there was a new Council change-over; however, an OIP opinion did state a motion for <br />reconsideration need not be agendized and it must be made at the very next meeting, unless <br />there is some specific rule otherwise. <br /> <br />Lq-Fnmy`kdyr`hcsgdBnllhrrhnmhrs`jhmfLq-Qddrlrsdrshlnmx <br />trying to correct the minutes or address deficiencies in the minutes. He said as far as any <br />lnshnmenqqdbnmrhcdq`shnmnesgdBnllhrrhnmlr`btions the rules have a time limit prescribed <br />by that; and as the matter is not agendized today, he did not see any further action that the <br />Commission can take today. <br /> <br />Mr. Rees clarified he was really trying to help the Commission by clearing up procedural <br />errors. He noted that there were also other procedural errors such the original sign about the <br />project was not taken down when the application was withdrawn and no new sign was posted. <br /> <br />Commissioner Domingo noted that a motion for reconsideration of an action must be made by <br />someone who was on the prevailing side, and no motion was made; and if there was no one <br />wishing to make a motion at this time the Commission should adjourn the meeting. <br /> <br />Lq-Qddrr`hc`bbnqchmfsnQnadqslrQtkds the Commission has to vote on a motion or by <br />unanimous consent, and it was clear Commissioner Domingo voted against the main motion, <br />noting essentially he would have been against the amendment also. He then noted that since a <br />variance from Chapter 27 was granted the Parks project can no longer be insured under the <br />NFIP participating program, which he understands HUD requires. He added that he would <br />like to have the restroom relocated to the highest elevation of the property, noting the need for <br />this occur and the need to happen correctly. <br /> <br />RECESSEDiSgdBg`hqb`kkdc`rgnqsqdbdrr`s2936o-l- <br />RECONVENEDiSgdlddshmfqdbnmudmdc`s2941o-l- <br />Commissioner Iwashita then moved to adjourn to executive session to discuss the matter, <br />seconded by Commissioner Ishibashi, and unanimously carried by a voice vote of all <br />Commissioners in attendance. <br />EXECUTIVE SESSIONiSgdBnllhrrhnmvdmshmsndwdbtshue session at 3:52 p.m. to discuss <br />this matter further with its counsel. The Commission came out of executive session at 4:50 <br />p.m. <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.