My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-02-05 Windward Planning Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Minutes
>
2010
>
2010-02-05 Windward Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 2:26:24 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 2:26:22 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
improvements consisting of shoulders and continued berm treatment to the property, which <br />would be consistent with the Hawaiian Rainforest 10-acre site that the Commission approved a <br />year ago <br />Commissioner Kern at this time stated that he does have an interest in the property across the <br />street, otherwise known as Ulupono Center, but that he has no interest with Greenhouse <br />Specialists whatsoever so it will not affect the outcome of his decision. He then indicated the <br />locations of the County- and State-owned portions of the roadways in the area. <br />Ms. Leithead Todd pointed out that the road on the Rain Forest application was going to remain <br />in private ownership, whereas, the portion of Milo Street fronting the subject parcel that is <br />privately owned is currently under consideration for dedication to the County; and she agreed <br />with Mr. Yeh that the portion of Milo Street fronting the property should be widened an <br />additional 20 to 22 feet to align with the approximately 80-foot wide State-owned portion of <br />Milo Street. <br />Mr. Hayashi stated for the record that proposed Condition E should be corrected to require a 20- <br />foot setback rather than a 40-foot setback. Mr.Yeh stated that instead of a 20-foot setback it <br />should actually be 22 feet. <br />Tim Rees spoke in support of the application, noting he is friends with the Seatons and have <br />done some business in the past with them as he does build greenhouses and shade houses. He <br />expressed his concern about the Keaau Bypass backing up and the general traffic congestion on <br />the main road servicing this project caused by the layout of the lanes on the Bypass Road. He <br />said the solution to this problem is to create a smooth merge of two lanes from Highway 11 onto <br />Keaau Bypass into one, noting there is approximately a mile and a half to do this merge from the <br />right to the left lane, suggesting the State Department of Transportation put up signs stating <br />“Single Lane Ahead, Pahoa Through Traffic Left Lane Only.” He noted this solution, although <br />several planners and engineers were interested, appears to have fallen through the cracks, noting <br />an instance of the County informally stating they have contracted with the State DOT to manage <br />the intersection lights but no contract can be found. He pointed out that the barricades in front <br />of the Keaau High School football field were installed because people were trying to pass on the <br />right of the three lanes in that area, adding an improper entry lane beyond the Old Keaau Village <br />Road intersection needed to be removed as it was adding to the traffic problem in the area. <br />There was no further public testimony offered at this time. <br />Regarding the State Land Use Boundary Amendment, it was moved by Commissioner Iwashita <br />and seconded by Commissioner Domingo to send a favorable recommendation to the County <br />Council. Commissioner Iwashita said it was his conviction that all community development <br />plans should have a designation of urbanized areas in the existing urban cores and that the <br />Commission should look at those designations in providing community guidance on where <br />rezonings such as these would be allowed, noting the property is on the urbanized area and <br />questioned why the community did not include these lands in the CDP. Commissioner Iwashita <br />5 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.