Laserfiche WebLink
3D. Surrounding Zoning and Land Uses <br /> The subject Property is located 3.5 miles to the north of Pahala. The entire surrounding <br /> area is zoned Agriculture 20-acres (A-20a) and is used for agricultural purposes. A large <br /> area zoned Forest Reserve (FR) is located roughly 2 miles to the west. The nearest <br /> neighboring residence to the proposed use is over 1,800 feet to the northwest, on the <br /> opposite side of Wood Valley Road. <br /> Edmund C. Olson Trust owns several other properties in the area including the adjacent <br /> 131.48-acre lot to the west(TMK (3) 9-6-011: 006), two smaller parcels next to Wood <br /> Valley Road(TMK (3) 9-6-011: 013 and 014), a 634.66-acre parcel to the south (TMK <br /> (3) 9-6-012: 021) and a 1,749.83-acre parcel to the west(TMK (3) 9-6-007: 001). <br /> 3E. Flood Insurance Rate Map <br /> The Federal Emergency Management Agency's Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) <br /> designates the area of the proposed development to be in Flood Zone X (areas outside of <br /> the 500-year flood) (Figure 7). <br /> The Pahala/Wood Valley area has several perennial and non-perennial streams associated <br /> with the Waloala River system. The Pi`ikea Gulch is located roughly 0.25 miles south of <br /> the subject site along the southern border of the adjacent parcel identified as TMK (3) 9- <br /> 6-011: 006. This gulch runs south and has a non-perennial stream, meaning there is not a <br /> continuous flow of water year-round. In addition, a second non-perennial stream <br /> associated with the Waloala River system is shown to begin north of the subject Property <br /> and run through the southern end of the parcel. This intermittent stream is in a heavily <br /> vegetated area more than 300 feet downslope to the east from the proposed 2-acre site <br /> and nearly 20 feet lower in elevation (Figure 8). Neither of these stream systems have the <br /> potential to cause significant flooding to the subject site or proposed use. Impacts to these <br /> streams is very unlikely given the small area of ground disturbance proposed and distance <br /> to the streams. <br /> 19 <br />