My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
PL-SMA-2022-000018, PL-SPP-2022-000018 01.06.23 K. POMEROY & K. TOUBMAN TESTIMONY
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2023
>
2023-01-19 Leeward
>
Item #2 Ahu Pohaku Ho'omaluhia, LLC (Formerly Robert Watkins and Jean Sunderland)(PL-SPP-2022-000018)
>
Additional Info Provided to LPC for Consideration at 1/19/2023 Hearing
>
PL-SMA-2022-000018, PL-SPP-2022-000018 01.06.23 K. POMEROY & K. TOUBMAN TESTIMONY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2023 8:51:39 PM
Creation date
1/20/2023 11:53:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Plan Doc Template
Document Date
1/6/2023
Related Permits
PL-SMA-2022-000018, PL-SPP-2022-000018
Parcel Number
540090140000
Description
KATHERINE POMEROY AND KARL TOUBMAN, TESTIMONY FOR AHU POHAKU HOOMALUHIA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mill for their Retreat on many occasions in the past. Another plan HIR had to ameliorate the Maluhia traffic was <br />to use shuttle buses. That never happened. <br />2. Hawaii Island Retreat will be on the real estate market soon. According to a Hawaii Life realtor, Hawaii <br />Island Retreat will soon be on the market for around $15-19,000,000. It appears that they want to add value to <br />their real estate at the expense of the community. On 12/28/22, I spoke with Jessica Andrews, the planner in <br />charge of this application. She was not aware of this fact. Why was this not disclosed to the planner in charge? <br />3. Much of the TMK is in a SMA and conservation zone. Where will the new building(s) be located? There <br />are already 3 buildings in the SMA that they use as their hotel/Retreat. How was this allowed? They have also <br />held wedding events in the restricted use zones. <br />4. They have not complied with the shoreline access condition of their special permit. It has been blocked <br />off and re-routed. The Public Access signs on Akoni Pule Hwy and Pratt Road were taken down for over a year <br />and before that the signs were not always posted. They just put some of the Public Access signs up again and <br />unlocked some of the public access gates recently, presumably so as to appear in compliance. <br />5. The entire Public Access should be walked by a planner with the attached public access doc and map <br />as a reference (attached). Most alarming is that coastal public access going east is blocked by what appears to by <br />4 hog wire fences that extend to the coastal cliffs (see attached map of eastern section). The most westerly fence <br />has no gate (see attached photos). Two of the middle fences have gates near the coastline, but are burdened with <br />billy goats and cattle at various times. Even if someone climbed the first fence at their peril on the cliff (and it <br />appears that some people have done so), they would still have to chance the gauntlet of the livestock. It is hard to <br />tell from a distance, but it appears that the fourth, most easterly fence has no gate, thus restricting coastal access <br />through the adjacent Lot 22 from Lot 16. The coastal public access has been blocked with fencing for easily over <br />10 years. <br />6. Failure to comply with several conditions of SP NO. 1117. They have not been "good neighbors." The <br />most glaring example (and there are many) is that the now defunct Honopueo Community Association members <br />were forced to pay for Maluhia Road improvements that was required by the county for their Special Permit. <br />None of the other owners have a special permit and could use that road as it was. HIR then sued the neighbors to <br />get additional compensation for those improvements. There was no countersuit, and the Retreat got less than half <br />(about $4500 per lot) of what they originally sought ($10,000 per lot). <br />7. Will the shoreline public access be preserved after the PCRS? The Retreat is applying for another PCRS <br />to restrict the Retreat to 5 acres and retain the other land that has the currently blocked shoreline public access on <br />it. See attached photo, which is posted on Lokahi Road, NOT on Akoni Pule Hwy. The community should <br />finally have the ENTIRE shoreline public access open, unburdened, accessible, and safe. <br />8. Where would they get the water for this project? They only have a 5/8" water meter on Akoni Pule for <br />county water. <br />Thank you for attention to these longstanding concerns. <br />Sincerely, <br />Karl Toubman and Katherine Pomeroy <br />TMK 5-4-009-024-000 Parcel 54009024000 <br />Attachments <br />1. BOC doc 2009-829853 <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.