My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-05-12 TMOYLAN
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-05-12 TMOYLAN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 2:33:43 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 2:33:39 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
YUEN:Right now there isnt a condition on that. The cabinet shop according to <br />our site plan is 52 feet from the property boundary. <br />GALLAGHER:Its not. He should put it in front of his house. <br />SPRINGER:And thats according to an on-site inspection that was made? <br />YUEN:Mr. Darrow? <br />DARROW:At the time of the inspection, I didnt actually measure the distance to the <br />property line. Were relying on the applicants representation on the site plan. It was definitely <br />out of the setback, but that would be the concern of the Planning Department. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you both. Commissioner Siracusa. <br />SIRACUSA:Yes. Mr. Torigoe has just handed me some possible wording that was <br />addressingmyconcern;andIdliketoshareitwithyouall.Applicantsshallinstallanair <br />filtration system to control dust and fugitive emissions from the shop sufficient to meet all <br />applicable State and Federal air quality standards, and which shall be used whenever dust or <br />emissions may be generated. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. Commissioners, weve heard from language from <br />Commissioner Siracusa that shes suggesting be inserted at Condition No. 5. <br />SIRACUSA:Or actually in replacement of what is now there for -. <br />SPRINGER:To replace what is now Condition No. 5. Mr. Torigoe, do we need, how <br />should we proceed with this recommendation from our colleague? <br />TORIGOE:Well, first of all, let me just say that this was just something that I <br />suggested for discussion. As the Director has stated, I dont have any technical knowledge as to, <br />you know, how best word that. And, I guess, I suppose thats another option, is if you really <br />wanted to address this properly, you could also continue the matter to research that and construct <br />a condition which really would address it. But, in any case, if you wanted to add the condition, <br />then that would probably be done at the point that youre making a motion. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. Mr. Director, do you have any comments of Mr. Torigoes <br />suggestion of further research? <br />TORIGOE:Well, the way he wrote the condition is a lot better than we did so Im <br />happy with his wording. Its up to the Commission whether theyre ready to go ahead with this <br />today or want some more information. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. Commissioner Salavea? <br />SALAVEA:For the applicant, Mr. Moylan, what you heard regarding the <br />recommendation made by Commissioner Siracusa, what is your input regarding that change? <br />17EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.