Laserfiche WebLink
BOWMAN: Okay, thank you. <br /> <br />WATANABE: Any -? Ms. Giffin. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Going back to Condition H that we were speaking of about the Traffic <br />Impact Î and maybe this is something I could ask Ki, well, I donÓt know. Ten years ago? Yeah, <br />I mean, is the traffic condition on that section of Palani Road the same today? Or should there be <br />an update? I mean, this is just a question. <br />COTTLE: Probably a better question for Ki since he has the traffic engineering <br />background. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Okay, thank you. I would like that addressed. <br /> <br />WATANABE: Okay. Mr. Emler. HeÓs already coming. Yeah, we got you on the hot <br />seat for two, three items. <br />EMLER: Good morning. <br />COMMISSIONERS: Good morning. <br />EMLER: Aloha, Geri. <br />GIFFIN: Thank you. Aloha as well. <br />EMLER: Welcome back to the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: Thank you. <br />EMLER: Your question is whether -. <br /> <br />WATANABE: Just, Mr. Emler, IÓve been informed maybe you should state your name at <br />least formally for the -. <br /> <br />EMLER: My name is Kiran Emler with the Department of Public Works, <br />Engineering Division. <br /> <br />WATANABE: Please proceed. <br /> <br />EMLER: Okay. The question is whether the 1998 traffic study should be updated in <br />order to consider the amendments to the zone change and the Special Permit. I donÓt believe that <br />would be necessary; the mitigation that has been approved alread <br />approval is adequate to address any concerns. As a matter of fact, the original traffic study <br />didnÓt really indicate any mitigation other than the flashing light. So this condition that is <br />imposed goes above and beyond the recommendations that were made in that report. <br /> <br />EXHIBIT A <br />5 <br /> <br />