2005-05-20 EXHIBIT C HUGGETT PC - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

TORIGOE:Well lets clarify the motion. Is the intent of the motion to deny standing to all of the intervenors that have requested intervention at this point-, people who have requested intervention at this point? WATANABE:That is correct. TORIGOE:Mr. Hayashi can we have a list of that -, those to make sure that is the proper understanding? HAYASHI:Okay. There were -, the reason why were hesitating is because there were 2 people with a formal petition. The rest didnt file any kind of formal petition but by letter form. So does the motion include all those. WATANABE:FortherecordIwouldsuggestthatweincludealleventhoughIrealize they did not, you know file the correct form and that would give them their response. HAYASHI:Okay. Thank you. That would be Brian Haney, Jack and Kelley Armstrong, Mark and Kim Spangler, Lowell Zimmerman and Charles Buscemi. WATANABE:To elaborate my reason for deniable would be untimely filing. MCCALL:Ill second the motion. SPRINGER:Is there a second? MCCALL:Second. SPRINGER:Is there any discussion on this motion before the Hawaii County Planning Commission? It was moved by Commissioner Watanabe and seconded by Commissioner McCall to deny all the requests for standing in this contested case. Commissioner McCall. MCCALL:I feel, I think we perhaps need to put some things on the record. That I think that -, I feel that the -, there has been a substitution of the Applicant. Huggett has been substituted for Eric Soto but I feel that the application remains and as such these new requests for intervention are untimely because of that. That these parties had their opportunity to request intervention when Mr. Soto first put in the application. SPRINGER:Thank you Mr. McCall is there any other discussion on the matter? Mr. Hayashi. HAYASHI:Thank you Madame Chair. Commissioner Watanabe? WATANABE:Aye. HAYASHI:Commissioner McCall? EXHIBIT C 24