Laserfiche WebLink
HAYASHI:No, not that I know of. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. Commissioner Iwashita? <br />IWASHITA:Counsel do you have any cases that, let me preface my question. The rule <br />of law that you cite inthe memo, or that your firm cites in the memo, talks about a permit that <br />runs with the land. We don€t actually have a permit issued in this case. Do you know of any <br />case, which addresses the issue of an application being transferable or that the application runs <br />with the land. <br />SCHULTZ:We were not able to find anyone specifically in Hawaii, I think the reason <br />is is that, it probably wouldn€t go up onto appeal until you know the permit has been formally <br />denied or approved. There is, there€s one case that was recently decided in January 2005 by the <br />HawaiiSupremeCourtwhereIbelieveVoicestreamappliedforapermit.I€msorry,madea <br />claim so that there was no permit needed this Commission said that there was that when on <br />appeal. The Supreme Court in its caption makes a quick note that T-Mobile is now the persons <br />who is seeking the, actually appealing the decision that a permit was needed and it does say <br />without any. In other words, the Supreme Court doesn€t take up any issue with that. But that€s, <br />that€s what I can say to you without doing more research on to this subject. <br />IWASHITA:I€m not getting that what is the significance of the case you just cited? <br />SCHULTZ:It basically, it€s just pure dicta. That the Supreme Court had no problem <br />with the Applicant changing midstream. I guess once again, you have to look at the Planning <br />Commission Rules 911(a) again, doesn€t ask about the Applicant. The Applicant really should <br />not be important. You don€t want the Commission making decision on an Applicant on whose <br />brother it is, you know it€s the project that this Planning Commission should look at. How does <br />this project effect the Special Management Area. <br />SPRINGER:Commissioner Iwashita follow up? <br />IWASHITA:I€m new so you gotta pardon me. But I guess my concern is that, I think <br />everyone agrees that a permit runs with the land, right? But we don€t have a permit issued in this <br />case. What we€re talking about is whether or not the rule, under our rules whether we have a <br />new application or not. And so, to me it€s not real helpful to say that a permit runs with the land <br />cause it doesn€t address the direct issue. To me it€s not you know, it€s not real helpful. So I was <br />just asking for any other authority but basically there is none. <br />SCHULTZ:I have, I cannot cite you any right now. <br />SPRINGER:Mr. Director you€ve heard Commissioner Iwashita€s concern that this is <br />not a permit that has already been granted that we€re discussing but rather an application that is <br />in process. Do you have any comments in addition to those made by Mr. Schultz? <br />EXHIBIT C <br />7 <br /> <br />