Laserfiche WebLink
and easement from the top. In the alternative, if that cannot be achieved, then the option would <br />be to still retain this easement but increase this lot by the area that you would be losing by <br />creating this easement. So if this is one acre in size and if you reduce, if you eliminate the <br />easement area and it comes out to maybe 40,000 square feet, then you need to provide maybe <br />3,000 or 4,000 square feet on this side to make this lot fully c <br />HOUSEL: Does the applicant understand that they may, if indeed they want to use that access, <br />that they may have to re-subdivide to allow for that acreage? <br />FUKE: Correct. This would be like a consolidation and re-subdivision, correct. And we also <br />understand that the fair share requirement would be for the creation of any new additional lot, <br />and so primarily it would be this lot here however itÓs created. In addition to that, you already <br />have proposed Condition E, which limits the number of dwelling units on the newly created area <br />to one, so itÓs understood that the obligation for fair share would not encumber this parcel with <br />this dwelling. <br />HOUSEL: I see, okay. Is the applicant in agreement with the terms and conditions in the -? <br />FUKE: Yes. <br />HOUSEL: Okay. Commissioners, any questions? <br />BOWMAN: So if this easement does not work, and they come off of the mauka, or whatever, <br />that one -. <br />FUKE: Correct. <br />BOWMAN: Would they come off of the existing easement and then make a flag, or a whole <br />another one above it? Because it looks like that road, like dogleg, bends. <br />FUKE: Well, it probably, itÓs the photo shot, and you can actually see this section. ItÓs almost <br />like near the elbow, yeah? <br />BOWMAN: Right. <br />FUKE: So you know, itÓs not the best of access point. This is t <br />access issue. <br />BOWMAN: But would the access come off of the existing -? <br />FUKE: It would have to come off of this point over here. <br />BOWMAN: Okay, not another one right above it. <br />FUKE: No, not another, no, because the affected property is really this property; this property is <br />someone elseÓs property, so -. <br />4 <br />EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />