Laserfiche WebLink
and expand the building footprint by approximately 3,000 square feet to 12,325 square feet. She <br /> described the design of the new tower and said that the angel statue would be similar to the <br /> existing one, and that the element below the statue would have decorative glass to be backlit. <br /> She said that this whole tower section of the building would be part of the new variance that is <br /> required for this project. She noted that the new monument sign shown on the illustration would <br /> require a sign permit application to be reviewed at a later date. <br /> Commissioner Greenwell asked if the proposal was to replace the existing statue with another <br /> one that was going to be several feet higher. Ms. Newlon responded that her understanding from <br /> the application was that the section with decorative glass below the statue is the new addition <br /> that would increase the overall height by about 16 feet. <br /> There being no further questions of staff from the Commissioners, Chairman Roth called upon <br /> the applicant. Mr. Corey Daniels from The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints <br /> introduced himself and explained the height increase; he said that as part of this major renovation <br /> project, they are replacing all the mechanical and electrical systems, and that the additional space <br /> in the base of the spire is to house an air handling unit so that it will not be sitting on the rooftop. <br /> He further said that they are also trying to keep the height in proportion with the increased square <br /> footage of the building. The applicant, Kevin Wilde, concurred with Mr. Daniels' explanation <br /> and said he did not have any other items to present. <br /> Chairman Roth asked where the existing statue would be on the proposed elevation drawings. <br /> Mr. Wilde said in clarification that the existing tower would be demolished completely and not <br /> be reused. He then said in response that the new angel statue would start at 79 feet as shown on <br /> the elevations; therefore, the existing height of 71 feet, including the statue, would occur within <br /> the cupola element below the new statue. Chairman Roth also asked about height change of the <br /> main building. Mr. Wilde responded that there would be a slight increase from 20 feet 4 inches <br /> to 21 feet. Chairman Roth then asked for an explanation as to why the spire needs to be so much <br /> taller while the building itself is not going to be taller. Mr. Wilde responded with three reasons: <br /> that some mechanical is added to the base of the spire; that the building is expanded in length, so <br /> they try to maintain the proportion of the length versus the height; and that the tower element is <br /> modeled after the Honolulu Tabernacle, a Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints meeting <br /> building. In response to Chairman Roth's further question about the backlit element, Mr. Wilde <br /> said that it would be like a beacon or a lighthouse,which would fit in the area in their opinion <br /> and also fit some of the religious aspects and ideals of the temple. He added that the light would <br /> be a gentle backlit technique and would not be emanating from the spire. <br /> There being no other questions, Chairman Roth opened the floor for comments and said that he <br /> was fine with the proposed expansion of the building to the makai direction, which would not be <br /> noticeable from the highway and seems more balanced, and that he was also fine with the <br /> monument sign as illustrated, although sign was not part of the Commission review at this time. <br /> He said, however, that the added height and the backlit elements gave him pause, and that he was <br /> not sure about having the light inside of the spire as opposed to the existing indirect light that just <br /> makes the spire glow. Commissioner Werchick shared Chairman Roth's opinion that the <br /> horizontal expansion was not troublesome and would be unnoticeable from any distance; <br /> however, he would take strong exception to the increased elevation particularly if it was to be <br /> 5 <br /> Kailua Village Design Commission <br /> December 13,2022,Meeting Minutes <br />