Laserfiche WebLink
of clarity about who does own it. But itÓs not that the owners are opposed to putting signs or <br />speed bumps or anything, because they really do support the idea of being safe; itÓs just they <br />donÓt have control in order to do it. And we really ask that the problems with the homestead <br />road issue not get imported into this SMA. ItÓs been quite a process getting to here anyway. <br />HOUSEL: Commissioner Bowman. <br />BOWMAN: You referred to homestead road now Î I havenÓt heard that. Sorry. <br />VITOUSEK: Excuse me, I misspoke. What happened is, in some of these areas there were big <br />tracts of land that were owned by a number of people in common. And so they would go into <br />court in a partition action; the court would partition the lots out to different owners and then <br />would lay out these roadways on a partition map without any real clarity as to who owned it. So <br />I misspoke in saying homestead road, although itÓs kind of the same theory when the court lays <br />out areas and reserves roads, but itÓs not specific as to who owns the roads. <br />BOWMAN: So are you then referring to Stardust Road? <br />VITOUSEK: IÓm referring to Stardust Lane -. <br />BOWMAN: Okay, thank you. <br />VITOUSEK: My understanding is Stardust Lane was one of the roads that were laid out on this <br />1914 -. <br />BOWMAN: A homestead road. <br />VITOUSEK: Yeah. <br />BOWMAN: Okay, so Stardust Lane is the road in question with, you donÓt, we donÓt know who <br />owns it. <br />VITOUSEK: ThatÓs correct. <br />BOWMAN: But the initial paving, you donÓt know who did it? <br />VITOUSEK: That was not done by the owners of this unit; that was done, I think, in conjunction <br />with another project that was approved. Jeff? <br />DARROW: Correct. That was done in conjunction with the development across the road. But it <br />was actually a requirement placed on this application. So the requirement was met, and thatÓs -. <br />VITOUSEK: Yeah, the requirement to pave it was placed on this application originally, but itÓs <br />been determined by the Department to have been satisfied. <br />9 <br />EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />