My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-05-22 TKONAHEIGHTS
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2008
>
2008-05-22 TKONAHEIGHTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 2:47:18 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 2:47:08 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ATTA: I guess this development process is a long process, even for the private <br />owners who have to plan things and, you know, pay for studies and stuff like that. When we <br />were starting this, David and Greg Golden and Ernie Mansi have been actually involved in it <br />for two, a little over two years, almost three years from when they first started looking at the <br />property. The CDP, the original deadline for completion of the CDP was much earlier at that <br />time and we were kind of started our studies with the idea and thinking that the CDP would <br />be completed by the end of last year; and so that was the timing that we were initially going <br />with. We understand that it got extended as the work of the committee involved more, and <br />more, you know, more communication with the community. And so that’s why the timing <br />doesn’t fit. We had made it with the original schedule in mind; and so that’s how come we <br />submitted it within that timetable. But we’re, you know, we’re aware of the moratorium so <br />we know that the rezoning will be, you know, conditional on the CDP approval; and we <br />understood that. But, you know, as in development timing is important, both from a pricing <br />and market standpoint; and so there’s always a risk involved. We’re trying to minimize the <br />lag times and delay and be ready. So, and we thought we were doing it. Obviously when the <br />CDP deadline extended then that changed it.But some of the financing and planning, you <br />know, is due to that schedule. And so that’s why we submitted it. It was never with any <br />intention of trying to supersede or preempt any of the, you know, the work of the CDP there. <br />Cause we’ve been keeping in close contact with that. <br />SIRACUSA: Follow-up? <br />WATANABE: Follow-up. <br />th <br />SIRACUSA: I do notice that the resolution was signed on March 12 so you did <br />have time to ask for a delay to have this come to us later on. I really wished you had because <br />it’s an awful lot of material to present us with and ask us to make a decision that may or not <br />really be consistent with the CDP, which we haven’t seen yet. And I like to feel that, you <br />know, I’m being diligent in reviewing all the material before I make my decisions; and <br />you’ve sort of taken that away from me, and I’m not happy with that. So I just want you to <br />know that, that that, there may have been all these other reasons but it still means that the <br />Commissioners do not have an opportunity to adequately study this matter and study it in <br />relation to the draft CDP. <br />WATANABE: Mr. Rho. <br />RHO: In the background report, Applicant Exhibit 9, are you familiar with <br />that? <br />LIM: This is -? <br />RHO: And I have questions on paragraphs 2, 3, and the last paragraph. It <br />says on the second paragraph that the developer will fulfill County park requirements by <br />providing a three-acre park on nearby land. And you mentioned in passing something about <br />that park would be mauka of the property. Is that on the same, in the same area as that <br />affordable housing? <br />EXHIBIT B <br />11 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.