Laserfiche WebLink
Regarding the amendment to Section 25-5-152 (b) of Chapter 25 (Zoning Code), Hawaii County <br />Code, it was moved by Commissioner Springer and seconded by Commissioner Alameda that a <br />favorable recommendation be forwarded to the Hawai`i County Council as recommended by the <br />Planning Director. There was no discussion. A roll call vote was taken and motion carried with <br />six ayes (Springer, Alameda, Graham, Mccall, Smith and Galdones) and two absent and excused <br />(Siracusa, Fujikawa). <br />AMENDMENT TO RULE 9The Commission took this item up at 11:01 a.m. with <br />PLANNING DIRECTORapproximately 7 people from the public in attendance. <br />ACT 169 & ACT 76 <br />INITIATOR: PLANNING DIRECTOR <br />Amendment to Planning Commission Rule 9 to incorporate changes adopted by Act 169 and Act <br />76 of the 2001 and 2004 State Legislative Sessions, respectively, and for consistency with other <br />applicable sections of Chapter 205A, Hawaii Revised Statutes. Minor housekeeping changes are <br />also proposed. <br />(SEE EXHIBIT E) <br />MINUTES - The Commission took up the following minutes at this time, 12:04 p.m. <br />December 2, 2004 - It was moved by Commissioner Springer and seconded by <br />Commissioner McCall that the Commission approve and accept the minutes as circulated and <br />have it placed in file. There was no discussion. Motion was unanimously carried by a voice vote <br />of all Commissioners in attendance. <br />December 3, 2004 - It was moved by Commissioner Springer and seconded by <br />Commissioner McCall that the Commission approve and accept the minutes as circulated and <br />have it placed in file. There was no discussion. Motion was unanimously carried by a voice vote <br />of all Commissioners in attendance. <br />December 17, 2004 - It was moved by Commissioner Springer and seconded by <br />Commissioner McCall that the Commission approve and accept the minutes as circulated and <br />have it placed in file. There was no discussion. Motion was unanimously carried by a voice vote <br />of all Commissioners in attendance. <br />ADMINISTRATIVEThe Commission took up the following administrative <br />MATTERSmatters at this time, 12:05 p.m. <br />Status of appeals filed on Planning Commission decisions – Corporation Counsel - <br />Mr. Torigoe stated that he did not have anything new to report. Upon Commissioner Graham’s <br />inquiry regard Ainaloa Development Corporation’s Appeal, Mr. Torigoe stated that Judge Glenn <br />th <br />Hara has scheduled a briefing and argument on this appeal on May 27 at 10:00 a.m. <br />Commissioner Springer later inquired as to the status of the Blasman contested case hearing, to <br />which Mr. Yuen advised the Commissioners not to throw away their files as yet, but that there is <br />definitely a lot of progress being made as far as finalizing a land acquisition with the State. <br />7 <br /> <br />