Laserfiche WebLink
Merit Appeals Board May 16, 2022 <br />CHR. CABANAS: Okay, while you're reviewing your notes—Mr. Leopoldino, do you have any <br />questions or comments? <br />MR. LEOPOLDINO: I do. Thank you, Chair. I just wanted to thank you very much for putting <br />this together. I did review it and it is very helpful, and it will be a great resource for our <br />Recruitment and Examination team. Thank you very much for putting this together. <br />I am excited to present this to our R&E team. Thank you. <br />CHR. CABANAS: You're very welcome. The only reason why I did this was just to get it on <br />the record before my memory starts to go as the years go by. I mean, I'm not forgetful now, but <br />you know how that goes. <br />And, also, it would just help everyone because we don't have time to go through files and <br />records and put all this information together. So, this was really a general synopsis of my <br />recollection, `cause I couldn't look at files for exact dates or anything like that. <br />And the intent is really to have it memorialized. What you do with it is up—it's information. <br />You can—it's just to give you an idea what was done but it doesn't hold you back from <br />implementing new strategies, doing new things but it gives you a basis so that you know what <br />the history was—not only for the division but for the department, especially with Civil Service <br />Reform and the thoughts that everyone had back then in the early 2000's. <br />So, you're very welcome. <br />Ms. Mathews, did you find the duplication? <br />MS. MATHEWS: No, but I remember what one of my issues was—and I can't remember where <br />it is in there. And that had to do with somebody applying from another county for a similar <br />promotion kind of thing. And there wasn't a back check, the same way as a new application <br />would have had. So, they're assumed to be valid because they're doing the same job elsewhere. <br />And the reason I bring this up is because we had a recent case where, in Honolulu, a master's <br />degree—any master's degree was appropriate. And on the Big Island it is not, which means a <br />person on Oahu could have applied for that same job, having a degree that didn't fit that criteria <br />that gets slid in without aI mean, there's a discrepancy there, for me. <br />Personally, I think the master's degree is a master's degree, is a master's degree—and that <br />problem would go away. But I just find it, kind of, disconcerting that we assume that—since the <br />person passed there, that they pass here. <br />CHR. CABANAS: No. We all have our own perceptions and thoughts and we respect them. <br />I'm going to just make one comment and it's going to go back to the civil service reform <br />measures that occurred. <br />Page 8 <br />