My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-05-24 TWAIKOLOAMAUKA
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-05-24 TWAIKOLOAMAUKA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 2:54:00 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 2:53:57 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SIRACUSA: Yes. My question was about this roundabout, so I’ll ask you, Sidney, but I <br />have a feeling that I’m going to have to ask Ki to come back up again. Because the question was <br />if the community seems to want a roundabout and the ball is now, the decision- making ball is <br />now on the hands of the Public Works, what is Public Works’ position about that? Have they <br />had a chance to look at it yet, are they in general in favor or not in favor of roundabouts, you <br />know, philosophically or whatever? I know in some cases there have been situations where the <br />Department just did not approve something in general, and not necessarily here but elsewhere <br />where engineers did not like the idea of roundabouts. I went to a workshop about roundabouts <br />that some guy from Federal Highways gave in Puna several months ago, and it was very <br />enlightening. So I know that there are certain places where you can’t; there are definitive <br />criteria. So, Ki, could you give me some kind of indication as to whether the Department would <br />approve a roundabout in this particular situation, whether it meets the criteria of what we’re <br />talking about in terms of ample space and sight distance and all those goodies? <br />EMLER: I personally have not studied the intersection myself. From speaking with <br />the Traffic Division chief, it does seem like they are leaning toward a roundabout. But I can’t <br />say that for sure. I’m not the last word; and part of the reason for that is because the County <br />Council was asked, for new intersections, that roundabouts be considered, so -. <br />SIRACUSA: So then would you say that if we leave the door open in the rewording of <br />the conditions, then we are covering all basis? <br />EMLER: I think so. <br />SIRACUSA: Okay. <br />GRAHAM: Thank you, Commissioner Siracusa. <br />SIRACUSA: You have no problem with that, Sidney? <br />FUKE: On hindsight. But you know, we didn’t suggest this, but -. <br />SIRACUSA: You know like i.e. signalized or a roundabout. <br />FUKE: Well, on hindsight, we would want to have like the County make a <br />decision sooner than later ’cause it’s going to take us some time to develop the appropriate <br />construction plans; and until this is done, we can’t get subdivision approval. And we’ve been <br />held up really because the County is not telling us what they want. So the quicker the County <br />can tell us what they want, then it will be better; I think that’s fair for the developer. <br />SIRACUSA: Yeah, so we are Step One here; and as long as we leave the door open in <br />terms of wording, then it won’t create an extra time constraint or obstacle for you. Is that right? <br />FUKE: Generally correct. What it just says, when I kind of like re-read it further, <br />just says, “plans for the roundabout”, or whatever, “no later than six months after a determination <br />of the type of improvements is made by the Director of the Department of Public Works”; I <br />mean what it does is gives the Public Works an open-ended window. That’s what -. When I re- <br />read it, I was thinking, oh yeah, conceivably they could make up their mind like five years from <br />EXHIBIT C <br />11 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.