My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-05-24 TWAIKOLOAMAUKA
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-05-24 TWAIKOLOAMAUKA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 2:54:00 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 2:53:57 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
WATANABE: I think it’s still a part of this; the yellow sheet only revises Conditions B <br />and C. <br />WOODWARD: Right. But we’ve been asked to revise Condition I also according to the <br />other orange sheet we got. <br />GRAHAM: I believe that’s correct. Mr. Fuke? <br />FUKE: I might add. I think that the recommendation, if I understand it correct, <br />would be the Director’s recommendation as originally presented and as further amended by his <br />yellow sheet, because the other – I think that’s a very germane question, though, just for clarity – <br />because there are other editorial changes being recommended by the Director including the one <br />relating to the recreational impact fee; so I think that’s supposed to be taken in tandem. <br />GRAHAM: Yes, I think that’s intention of the motion. Is that correct? <br />WATANABE: Yes. Maybe I should have stated, “as proposed by the Director with his <br />amendments,” yeah? <br />GRAHAM: I think you did -. <br />WATANABE: Because this application really was to amend certain conditions for this <br />zoning. <br />GRAHAM: Okay. Any other comments from the Commissioners? Commissioner <br />Siracusa? <br />SIRACUSA: Just to make sure, so we are saying basically that the motion is to approve <br />all the Director’s recommendations; but as far as Conditions B and C, the revised <br />recommendations. Is that -. So that would include “I”, the multi-purpose community center as <br />the -, in lieu of the impact fee. <br />WATANABE: That’s correct. <br />SIRACUSA: Yeah, okay. I just wanted to clarify that. And I’m glad to see that you’re <br />going to put another access on the far right-hand part of the map there, because for that many <br />units it’s real important not to have a cul-de-sac community.I live in a cul-de-sac community, <br />and we have big concerns about emergency evacuation. So I’m glad to see that that’s going to <br />be attended to, so that they don’t have problems evacuating; fire engines can get in one way and <br />people can get out the other way.That’s always nice. Thank you. <br />GRAHAM: All right, Commissioner Siracusa. I think we can go ahead, then. Jeff, <br />would you take the vote on the motion? <br />DARROW: Sure. Just so I can summarize, the motion before us is to approve the <br />amendments as recommended by the Planning Director with the Planning Director’s proposed <br />amendments to Conditions B and C, as well as the proposed amendments to Condition B from Ki <br />Emler, which states on the second to the last line on Condition B, it states, “shall be granted in <br />EXHIBIT C <br />13 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.