My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-05-24 TWAIKOLOAMAUKA
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-05-24 TWAIKOLOAMAUKA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 2:54:00 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 2:53:57 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FUKE: That intersection, if you head Kona on the south side, then that road then <br />turns out to be Pua Melia Road. <br />GRAHAM: Right. <br />FUKE: Yeah. So it’s at that intersection; that’s the primary intersection that takes <br />you into the village. <br />GRAHAM: Okay, takes you into the existing village. But is that the primary one that <br />takes you into your subdivision. No, huh? <br />FUKE: No. The -. <br />GRAHAM: That’ll be up mauka more. <br />FUKE: Correct. The primary entrance to the project would be off of Waikoloa <br />Road. <br />GRAHAM: Okay. And is there signalization proposed for that? <br />FUKE: No. <br />GRAHAM: No. And the secondary one you are talking about is another one farther <br />mauka that you would say before Phase Two we’d like to have access for water maybe. But as <br />soon as Phase Two comes in, then it’ll have to be a channelized intersection and all? <br />FUKE: That’s correct as we read, yeah. <br />GRAHAM: All right, thank you very much. Other Commissioners? All right. <br />Anybody new come in for public testimony on this? Commissioner Watanabe? <br />WATANABE: Maybe we should ask Ki to comment about some of the changes just for <br />the record to see that the Public Works is in agreement. I think the revised version looks a lot <br />better than the initial one; especially since they did include what you guys requested, yeah, the <br />specific channelization. <br />GRAHAM: Yeah, Ki, and I think another issue is the bonding, so maybe you can <br />speak to the bonding aspect also. Can I swear you in first, or do I need to that? Ivan? No. Go <br />ahead. <br />EMLER: Yeah. I apologize for the late comments we made on this. So we did have <br />some concerns about the proposed amendments in that the previous conditions didn’t allow for <br />bonding of the improvements that are required under Condition C – if you notice that – the <br />intersection improvements; the original zone change did not allow for bonding of those <br />improvements. And so we looked at that and tried to figure out why. So I started looking at how <br />many dwellings were going to be allowed to be possibly occupied prior to all these <br />improvements actually being done or being constructed. And so I wanted something that was a <br />little bit more secure, so I contacted the Traffic Division about this issue of when the -, because <br />EXHIBIT C <br />8 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.