My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-05-24 TALLIANCE
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-05-24 TALLIANCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 2:54:09 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 2:54:06 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
WATANABE: I have a question of the applicant. And I don’t want to particularly <br />make a big deal out of this, however, the Sunderlands did have a request of moving – I think the <br />major concern was the pool – say, 500 feet from the boundary line. And I believe that was Phase <br />Two of your project. And I’m wondering if you would consider that a reasonable request, just <br />being a good neighbor to them. <br />BLAKE: We certainly want to do whatever we can to -. <br />GRAHAM: Mr. Blake? Yes. <br />BLAKE: Yes. That’s fine. We want to do whatever we can to minimize <br />impact on neighbors. There is a property that they represented there that is misleading. If you <br />look at that, there is a 30-acre property between the Sunderlands’ property and the proposed <br />property, so there is extensive difference. And we would be -, there is going to be noise and <br />windbreaks; there is going to be all consideration. This is a tentative plan, we now go to – <br />assuming acceptance of this – we go to a master plan where we want to have elevations and <br />appropriate placement of things. So to say it specifically they’ll be moved 400 feet would be <br />really hard to do, but taking neighbors’ concerns into consideration, absolutely. <br />WATANABE: Yeah, thank you. Like I said, I really don’t want to make a big <br />deal out of it. <br />GRAHAM: Any further questions from the Commissioners? Commissioner <br />Domingo? <br />DOMINGO: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Under the Recommendations, on the <br />point 8, access for the project from Akoni Pule Highway shall be via an access easement near <br />Union Market; this includes construction vehicles for the construction of the facility; and said <br />driveway access shall be improved, meeting with the approval of the State Department of <br />Transportation; and the applicant shall participate in the cost on improving the access roads with <br />the applicants of the approved 16-room Hawaiian Permaculture and Wellness Retreat located <br />below; and the improvements shall consist of those portions of Pratt Road and the former cane <br />haul road that provide access to the project site from Akoni Pule Highway with a minimum 20- <br />foot wide compacted gravel surface; and the Planning Director shall determine the cost to be <br />paid by the applicant after reviewing the total cost of the improvements. Will the applicant be <br />willing to adhere to whatever the Planning Director decides to be appropriate for the cost of <br />sharing? <br />NISHIMURA: Commissioner Domingo, the applicant has reviewed all of the <br />conditions being proposed, and has agreed to comply. <br />DOMINGO: Okay. Now the question is who will in this case compel the <br />Permaculture and Wellness Retreat to participate in this joint-venture. Mr. Torigoe, is there <br />anyway that we can impose such a condition on that permittee? <br />GRAHAM: Mr. Torigoe? <br />EXHIBIT B <br />14 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.