2023-01-19 Leeward Exh B (Items 1&2 Ahu Pohaku Hoomaluhia PL-SMA-2022-000018&PL-SPP-2022-000018)

Home

With those rules established, I will ask Petitioner to explain—Charles A. Anderson first,please, Trustee of the Charles A. Anderson Trust—to explain why he should be granted standing, according to Rule 4-6(b). And I'm just going to confirm with Counsel of the time limit. [A brief inaudible conversation with Mr. Salas Ferguson] Great, thank you, no time limit. I mean, please keep it relevant and brief and all of those things, but. Thank you. HAITSUKA: Vice Chair, I'll speak on behalf of Mr. Anderson. So Mr. Anderson and his wife as co-trustees of their trust own property which is adjacent to the project site, and they also share roadway and utility easements with the project site property, and on that basis, they have,they have an interest which is distinguishable from the general public. Also, the project will impact them and potentially cause them damages. So, under that prong of the standing,the Andersons seek their petition granted. KNOWLES: Thank you. Does the applicant have any objections to this petition? FUKE: Madam Chair, I've spoken with Ms. Sunderland. The applicant then in light of the fact that the three petitioners are adjoining property owners, we believe that they do meet the criteria for standing, and so as such, we have no objection. But nonetheless, we'd like to comment that hopefully, through even going through the mediation process, even prior to that, if there is an opportunity to resolve a lot of these issues, we'd like to have them resolved. KNOWELS: Thank you,Mr. Fuke. Jeff, does the DARROW: The Planning Department has no objections to granting standing. KNOWLES: Thank you. Does the Commission have any questions for the petitioner or the applicant or the Planning Department? Given that there are no questions, I will call for a motion to grant or deny the standing to Petitioner. Commissioner, is there a motion for action on this petition? Commissioner Vitousek. VITOUSEK: I move that the petition for standing in a contested case hearing filed by Charles A. Anderson, Trustee of Charles A. Anderson Trust, in Agenda Items 1 and 2 be granted. KNOWLES: Do I have a second? DELA CRUZ: Second. KNOWLES: Thank you, Commissioner Dela Cruz. Any discussion? Commissioner Paishon-Duarte. PAISHON-DUARTE: Yes, I mean this is one of the things that,topic areas,that I'm more concerned have been described in some of the written testimonies, it's just around access, shoreline access, and I just want to understand if the applicant, perhaps from the Planning Department, they can describe or, describe the steps that have been taken. I just want to understand if shoreline access is not prohibited from the amendment that's being 12 EXHIBIT B