Laserfiche WebLink
KNOWLES: Thank you so much. Now that we've clarified that, we'll move on to the second <br /> petitioneroh, I'm sorry we need a roll call vote,my apologies. <br /> JACKSON: Okay, Commissioner Vitousek? <br /> VITOUSEK: Aye. <br /> JACKSON: Commissioner Dela Cruz? <br /> DELA CRUZ: Aye. <br /> JACKSON: Commissioner Paishon-Duarte? <br /> PAISHON-DUARTE: Aye. <br /> JACKSON: And Chair Knowles? <br /> KNOWLES: Aye. <br /> JACKSON: Okay, motion carries, four-zero. <br /> KNOWLES: Thank you so much. With that motion carrying, we'll move along to the second <br /> petitioner,the petition of EWM Enterprises, LP by and through Charles A. Anderson. Again, I'd <br /> like you explain how your petition meets the standing criteria laid out in Rule 4-6(b). Thank you. <br /> HAITSUKA: Yes, the property owned by EWM Enterprises, LP is in the vicinity of the project <br /> site and, again, shares easements for access and utility purposes. <br /> KNOWLES: Thank you. Mr. Fuke? <br /> FUKE: Madam Chair, same comes as the first that we would have no objection. And likewise, <br /> for the third petition as well. <br /> KNOWLES: Thank you so much. Mr. Darrow? <br /> DARROW: Thank you,Vice Chair Knowles. The Planning Department has no objections to <br /> granting standing. <br /> KNOWLES: Thank you. Okay, any questions by the Commissioners? [None]I'll ask for a <br /> motionoh, Mike, you have a question? <br /> VITOUSEK: No, a motion. <br /> KNOWLES: Oh, thanks. <br /> 14 <br /> EXHIBIT B <br />