Laserfiche WebLink
PIPAN: Yes. <br /> DEFRANCO: Yes, okay. <br /> PIPAN: Yes,just a quick sentence response. <br /> DEFRANCO: Please. <br /> PIPAN: Any multiple of a zero impact is still zero impact. <br /> DEFRANCO: Okay, thank you. Thank you, okay. So, if there are no more <br /> questions then we can move for a motion then, Is that right? <br /> DARROW: If I could just interject. There are 2 conditions that the applicant is <br /> requesting an amendment to. John, have you been able to speak to the first one? <br /> PIPAN: For sure. <br /> DARROW: Okay. <br /> PIPAN: Yes, thank you. Condition D (3),this is relating to the frontage <br /> setbacks for structures. <br /> DEFRANCO: Speak a little bit louder. <br /> PIPAN: Yes, sorry. Condition D (3) would require a 100-foot structural <br /> setback from the road frontage on both of these properties and based on the surveys that we've <br /> submitted with the application the Stevenson's residence is within 85 feet approximately of that <br /> frontage. So, this is intended to clarify that any new structures would have to adhere to this 100- <br /> foot setback that the Stevenson's don't have to move their existing home at that I00-foot setback. <br /> DEFRANCO: Okay, so, it's not at a 100, it's at 85 feet, is that what you're saying? <br /> PIPAN: Yes. <br /> DEFRANCO: Okay. <br /> PIPAN: Yeah, based on Wes Thomas Associates survey. <br /> DEFRANCO: And then, the second one? <br /> DARROW: The second was the fair share. <br /> DEFRANCO: Oh, the fair share. Okay. <br /> 10 <br /> EXHIBIT C <br />