My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2023-01-19 Leeward Exh C (Item 3 Stevenson & Fumo PL-REZ-2022-000035)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2023
>
2023-01-19 Leeward
>
Stevenson, Stevenson & Fumo (PL-REZ-2022-000035)
>
2023-01-19 Leeward Exh C (Item 3 Stevenson & Fumo PL-REZ-2022-000035)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/16/2023 4:25:01 PM
Creation date
2/15/2023 11:11:05 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
VITOUSEK: Is that how it would be standard applied where even in the case of a <br /> CPR where there is separate ownership we're still adding on that fee? <br /> DARROW: Yes. <br /> VITOUSEK: Okay. <br /> DARROW: Because it's for any new additional lot that's created. This one, <br /> whereas several rezonings, I mean a number of rezonings that you'll see come across will talk <br /> about dwellings, right. You'll see the term additional dwelling units and so that's when fair share <br /> is related to the dwellings. In this particular case, it's related to the additional lot. <br /> VITOUSEK: Mahalo. In that case, I'd like to make a motion. I move that a <br /> favorable recommendation be forwarded to the County Council on the application for a Change of <br /> Zone, Docket 2022-000035, based on the Deputy Director's recommendation including the <br /> revised language from the January 16, 2023, letter Condition D (3) for new structures proposed <br /> after the effective date of this ordinance a 100-foot wide structural setback in lieu of the required <br /> 30-foot setback along the existing properties, public street frontage to provide an additional buffer, <br /> which shall be adopted. <br /> KNOWLES: I second. <br /> DEFRANCO: Okay. So — <br /> DARROW: I'm not sure, so, correct me if I'm wrong Commissioner Vitousek. <br /> The language for D (3)that we're looking at is that simple phrase that would be added to the 100- <br /> foot wide structural setback. Which is <br /> DEFRANCO: Paragraph 3. <br /> DARROW: within the January 16'h letter. <br /> VITOUSEK: That's the only new language, is the underline? Okay, cool. As <br /> long as the Condition D (3) states that. <br /> DARROW: Correct. Thank you. <br /> VITOUSEK: Yeah. <br /> KNOWLES: Second. <br /> DEFRANCO: So, we have a first and second. So, now we're open for discussion. <br /> VITOUSEK: Mahalo, I would just add that I think the language suggested by the <br /> applicant is reasonable and providing their existing structures that don't need to be moved. Also, I <br /> believe that increasing density is by creating a new lot. If that's the application of the fair share <br /> 12 <br /> EXHIBIT C <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.