Laserfiche WebLink
they also must have fees related to land use approvals as well but, that's one that brings in quite a <br /> bit of monies toward infrastructure projects is through building permit applications. <br /> PIPAN: If I may Chair,to add— <br /> DEFRANCO: Yes. <br /> PIPAN: —just a little bit to this topic. We've had a number of rezones with <br /> similar features. No increase in intensity or dwellings permitted on the lot not too far from this <br /> one. Kalawa, in Waimea as well. Neither of those and quite frequently many others similar to this <br /> don't have such a fair share requirement. It's just this Kaloko Mauka area. So, instead of doing <br /> this piecemeal almost discriminatory approach on this neighborhood. I think maybe it's through <br /> the ongoing subdivision and rezone code amendments a more systematic approach is taken to <br /> impacts on transportation infrastructure and what that actually means and how that's implemented. <br /> And I think the building permit example is a great example because that is an impact,right. <br /> You're building a structure, there's going to be traffic to and from it. But, in this case, there is no <br /> new structures, traffic is going to be as it has been since 1986 when these houses were built. <br /> KNOWLES: I just had a question. <br /> DEFRANCO: Yes. <br /> KNOWLES: I think what you say is true potentially. But basically, what we are <br /> doing now is subdividing it so that there are 2 fee-simple lots. Both of which can be sold and that <br /> theoretically could increase density on the property. I mean, maybe its only 2 or 3 more drivers or <br /> whatever it is but it still may have impact, correct? <br /> PIPAN: You're saying in terms of like family size that would— <br /> KNOWLES: Sure, I mean for example, or they could come before us and make <br /> another request to subdivide their 10 acres. I mean, you know density can increase hypothetically <br /> with this kind of subdivision. <br /> PIPAN: I think in this specific case, there are conditions that prohibit that in <br /> this ordinance. So, let me pull it up, pardon me. Okay, Condition F, "restrictive covenants in the <br /> deeds of all the proposed lots within the subject property shall give notice that the terms of the <br /> zoning ordinance prohibit the construction of a second dwelling unit and condominium property <br /> regimes on each lot", it goes on. But that's the crux of it. So— <br /> KNOWLES: Okay. <br /> PIPAN: — if a request to do like a Special Permit use or to come before the <br /> Planning Commission that's a discretionary permit you'd then be able to evaluate the impact of <br /> that use. But as it is,we're looking at 90% dedicated native forests and 2 single-family <br /> residences. <br /> 7 <br /> EXHIBIT C <br />