My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-05-24 TIBBETSON_2_
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-05-24 TIBBETSON_2_
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 2:54:35 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 2:54:33 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
them to us before the meeting, so that we’ll just have them right there in front of us when we <br />begin the meeting on that day. Is that all right? <br />MATSUKAWA: What would be the date when staff distributes? Maybe we could <br />work towards that date. <br />DARROW: Yeah, it would at least be one week prior to the hearing. If we <br />nd <br />were to get it on the Thursday -. Is that a Friday, June 22? <br />nd <br />GRAHAM: Yeah, I believe June 22 is a Friday. So June 15 will be a Friday, <br />th <br />so Jeff is saying if you could give it to him by June 14. But that gives you very little time after <br />June 11 unless you choose to move the first date. <br />DARROW: We would be able to mail it out on the Friday, the week before. <br />Anything that comes in usually about Monday of that week for the hearing, we’ll hold onto it to <br />pass out to the Commissioners because there is always that chance of the Commissioners not <br />getting it in the mail. <br />th <br />MATSUKAWA: So we could keep the 18; but I guess the parties are noticed that if <br />th <br />they want their documents circulated, they need to try to get it in before the 18. <br />GRAHAM: Okay. Commissioner Siracusa, do you want to comment? <br />SIRACUSA: Yes. I want to make a suggestion. I’m not sure if this is legal or <br />not; Mr. Torigoe will have to tell me if it isn’t. But in an effort to save some time and to give <br />you folks ample opportunity to draw up your Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, to allow <br />the Planning Commission ample opportunity to review and study, could you mail those directly <br />to the Commissioners, as well as submitting your copies to the Planning Department? That way, <br />even before the Planning Department sends us our copies, we will have maybe a couple of days <br />extra leeway to review the material. Is that allowed? <br />GRAHAM: Mr. Torigoe, do you have a comment on that? <br />TORIGOE: Well, I think if the parties are agreeable -. <br />SIRACUSA: And would you be willing to do it? <br />TORIGOE: Yes, if the parties are agreeable. And it’s the same thing as <br />coming to the Commission office or the Planning Department. <br />KRUEGER: I have no objection to that. Would we mail them to the individual <br />Commissioner’s home address, or just to the Planning Department? <br />SIRACUSA: No, mailing addresses. <br />GRAHAM: We’re thinking of home -, I believe Commissioner Siracusa is <br />thinking of home address, so we get them directly. <br />EXHIBIT A <br />11 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.